CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF SERVICE INNOVATION FACTORS INFLUENCING TO ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF MUNICIPALITY IN THAILAND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i4.3561Keywords:
conceptual framework, service innovation, local authoritative organization, municipality, thailand, organizational performanceAbstract
Introduction: The development of Local Authoritative Organizations (LAO) in Thailand has continued for a long time, amid efforts to centralize power especially since the civil service reform and national political factors in each period have always affected changes in Local Authoritative Organizations (LAO). According to the decentralization plan of the Act on Decentralization Plans and Procedures for Local Administrative Organizations, there are guidelines for transferring missions to local authoritative organizations in 6 areas: 1) infrastructure, 2) quality of life promotion, 3) community organization, society and maintaining peace and order 4) investment, commerce and tourism promotion 5) management and conservation of natural resources and the environment 6) arts and culture, traditions and local wisdom. Currently, there are a total of 7,848 local authoritative organizations, excluding Bangkok Metropolitan and Pattaya City.
Method: To examine the conceptual framework of Service innovation factors influencing to organizational performance of municipality in Thailand.
Results: The findings revealed that Innovative organization and Innovative capability affect to Performance Management through Operational performance and Innovative capability and Service Innovation affects to Organizational Performance
Conclusion: This study concluded that Conceptual framework of Service innovation factors influencing to Organizational performance of Municipality in Thailand consisted of Innovative Organization, Innovative Capability, Service Innovation related to Performance Management and Organizational Performance. Research on Factors in innovation and organizational management that affect the performance of local government organizations in the type of municipality. The researcher created a model by analyzing a total of 5 latent variables, divided into 3 external latent variables: innovative organizations; Innovative capabilities and service innovation As for the internal latent variables, there are 2 variables: performance management and organizational performance, as shown in Figure 6 Conceptual Framework.
References
Abdullah, T. and Date, H. 2009. “Public sector knowledge management: a generic
framework.” Public Sector ICT Management Review. 3(1).
Anand, P. and Saraswati, A. K. 2014. “Innovative Leadership: A Paradigm in Modern HR
Practices.” Global Journal of Finance and Management. 6(6) : 497 – 502.
Asiah Omar, N., Nazri, M., Alam, S. S., & Ahmad, A. 2016. “Assessing the Factors
Influencing Service Innovation Capabilities and Performance.” Information Management and Business Review. 8 : 52-63.
Asiedu, M.A., Anyigba, H., Ofori, K.S., Ampong, G.O.A. and Addae, J.A. 2020. “Factors
influencing innovation performance in higher education institutions.” The Learning Organization. 27(4) : 365-378.
Azmia, R. and Suradi, N. 2019. “Innovation capability and organization performance in
Malaysian public sector: A conceptual framework.” In AIP Conference Proceedings 2111. 020016-1–020016-6.
Becker, G. S. 1962. “Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis.” Journal of Political
Economy. 70(5) : 9-49.
Bontis, N., Chua Chong Keow, W., & Richardson, S. 2000. “Intellectual capital and business
performance in Malaysian industries.” Journal of Intellectual Capital. 1(1) : 85-100.
Carillo, M. R., and Alberto, Z. 2000. “Innovation, human capital destruction and firms’
investment in training.” The Manchester School. l68(3) : 331-348.
Collins, Jim C. 2001. Good to great: Why some companies make the leap and other don’t.
New York : Harper Collins.
Daniel, V. M., Lima, M. P. & Ferrari Dambros, A. M. 2017. “Innovation capabilities in
services: a multi-cases approach.” Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración. 30(4) : 490-507.
Davenport, T. H. 1997. Information ecology. New York : Oxford University Press.
Edvinsson, L., & Sullivan, P. 1996. “Developing a model for managing intellectual capital.”
European Management Journal. 14(4) : 356-364.
Gailly, B. 2018. Navigating innovation: How to identify, prioritize and capture opportunities
for strategic success. New York : Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th
Ed. New York : Pearson.
Hamdoun, M., & Zouaoui, M. 2017. “Impact of environmental management on competitive
advantage of Tunisian companies: The mediator Role of
organization culture.” International Review of Management and Marketing. 7(2) : 76-82.
Hatch, Nile W., and Jeffery H. Dyer. 2004. “Human capital and learning as a source of
sustainable competitive advantage.” Strategic Management Journal. 25(12) : 1155-1178.
Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. 2004. “Innovativeness: Its antecedents and
impact on business performance.” Industrial Marketing Management. 33(5) : 429-438.
Humphrey H. 2014. Effective leadership theory cases and applications. Los Angeles: Sage.
Jansen, R. J. G. 2011. “Information processing and strategic decision-making in small and
medium-sized enterprises: The role of human and social capital in attaining decision effectiveness.” International Small Business Journal. 31(2) : 192-216.
Jimenez-Jimenez, D., Martinez-Costa, M., & Sanz-Valle, R. 2014. “Innovation,
organizational learning orientation and reverse knowledge transfer in multinational companies.” Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management. 12(1) : 47-55.
Khanna, P., Carla D. J., and Steve B. 2014. “Director human capital, information processing
demands, and board effectiveness.” Journal of Management. 40(2) : 557-585.
Mahsud, R., Gary Y., and Gregory E. P. 2011. “Human capital, efficiency, and innovative
adaptation as strategic determinants of firm performance.” Journal of Leadership & Organization. 18(2) : 229-246.
Marquardt, M.J. 2002. Building the Learning Organization: A Systems Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success. New York : McGraw-Hill.
Mincer, J. 1958. “Investment in human capital and personal income distribution.” The Journal
of Political Economy. 66(4) : 281-302.
Noble, C. H., Sinha, R. K., & Kumar, A. 2002. “Market orientation and alternative strategic
orientation: A longitudinal assessment of performance implications.” Journal of Marketing. 66(4) : 25-39.
Nonaka, I. 1994. “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation.” Organization
Science. 5(1) : 14-37.
OECD/Eurostat. 2005. Oslo manual. 3th Ed. OECD : Paris.
Onkelinx, J., Tatiana S. M., and Linda F. E. 2016. “The human factor: Investments in
employee human capital, productivity, and SME Internationalization.” Journal of International Management. 22(4) : 351-364.
Ployhart, Robert E., Chad H. Van Iddekinge, and William I. Mackenzie Jr. 2011. “Acquiring
and developing human capital in service contexts: the interconnectedness of human capital resources.” Academy of Management Journal. l54(2) : 353-368.
Ramli, I., Hassan, A., Arifin A. and Jasmi A. 2017. “Factors Influencing Public Sector
Innovation Performance in Malaysia: Structural Equation Modelling Approach.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 7(2) : 629-645.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. 2016. Essentials of organizational behavior. 13th ed. England :
Pearson.
Roos, G., & Roos, J. 1997. “Measuring your company's intellectual performance.” Long
Range Planning. 30(3) : 413-426.
Ruzzier. (2007). “Human capital and SME internationalization: A structural equation model.”
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences. 24(1) : 15-29.
Sahoo, S. (2019). “Quality management, innovation capability and firm performance:
Empirical insights from Indian manufacturing SMEs.” The TQM Journal. 31(6) : 1003-1027.
Shahzad, F., Xiu, G., and Shahbaz, M. 2017. “Organizational culture and innovation
performance in Pakistan's software industry.” Technology in Society. 51 : 66-73.
Subramanian, A. M. 2012. “A longitudinal study of the influence of intellectual human capital onfirm exploratory innovation.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 59(4) : 540-550.
Urbano, D., Claudia A., and Andreu T. 2013. “Organizational resources and intrapreneurial
activities: An international study.” Management Decision. 51(4) : 854–870.
Weiss, D. S., & Legrand, C. P. 2011. Innovative intelligence: The art and practice of leading
sustainable innovation in your organization. Canada : John Wiley & Sons Canada.
Yen., Y-F. 2014. “The impact of bank’s human capital on organizational performance: How
innovation influences performance.” Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice. 15(1) : 112-128.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
