NOTARY'S RESPONSIBILITY IN THE EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY AS AN AUTHENTIC DEED OFFICIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i4.3342Keywords:
authentic deed, notary, responsibilitiesAbstract
Purpose: This research endeavors to investigate the obligations of notaries in their capacity as officials endowed with the power to authenticate deeds. These obligations consist of ethical, administrative, civil, and criminal, duties.
Theoretical Framework: Notaries have obligations as public officials. Indeed, a notary bears accountability not only to his fellow professionals but also to clients and members of the public who require his services by legal regulations and societal interests.
Method: This research is descriptive and the type of research is normative juridical. This research uses secondary data derived from primary sources, such as journals and secondary sources, namely the Internet and books
Results: The findings indicated that notaries must fundamentally adhere to the Notary Position Law and the Notary Code of Ethics when performing their duties and positions. This ensures that the notary always follows the procedures outlined in the Notary Position Law and Code of Ethics, thereby providing legal certainty to the parties involved in the deed. For each task that their clients entrust to them, notaries take full responsibility. There are always matters that accompany each occupation and become its responsibility.
Conclusions: The Notary Position Law specifies that if a notary commits an offence while performing his or her duties and responsibilities, the notary may be held accountable and punished through administrative, civil, and ethical sanctions. The Notary Position Regulation, the Notary Position Law, and the Notary Code of Ethics previously governed criminal sanctions against notaries, but these sanctions are no longer subject to legal regulation. Punishments for criminal offenses against notaries may be enforced by the provisions of the Criminal Code.
References
Anom, J., Kholil, M., & Pratama, P. W. (2022). Notary Legal Awareness towards the Notary Profession’s Code of Ethics in Sragen Regency. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 9(4), 168–178. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i4
Armansyah, Ginting, P., & Chusnanto. (2021). Sanksi Pidana Dan Sanksi Administratif Akibat Pelanggaran Kewajiban Dan Larangan Notaris. Pustaka Aksara.
Cahyanti, N., Raharjo, B., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2018). Sanksi Terhadap Notaris Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Akta, 5(1), 288–294. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1
Devi, N. M. L. S., & Westra, I. K. (2021). Akibat Hukum serta Sanksi Pemalsuan yang Dilakukan Notaris Kepada Penghadap Ketika Pembuatan Akta Otentik. Acta Comitas, 6(02), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i02.p03
Khalid, H., Zainuddin, Z., & Poernomo, S. L. (2023). Discriminatory Treatment of Fulfillment of Patient Rights in Services at Facilities by the Healthcare Social Security Agency in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(12), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.2053
Latifah, L. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris. Jurnal Officium Notarium, 1(1), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.20885/jon.vol1.iss1.art15
Muhammad, F. N., Widowaty, Y., & Raharjo, T. (2019). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Yang Dilakukan Oleh Notaris. Media of Law and Sharia, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.1101
Mulyana, D., & Abdughani, R. K. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Notaris/PPAT Terhadap Akta Beli Tanah Yang Batal Demi Hukum. Juris and Society: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(1), 106–118.
Natasari, E., Ginting, B., Sitepu, R., & Kalo, S. (2020). Professional and Moral Responsibilities of Notaries in Supporting Development in Medan City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 452(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/452/1/012070
Pakarti, T. A., & Erni, D. (2022). Jabatan Notaris Dan Kode Etik Notaris: Bagaimana Peran Dan Fungsi Dewan Kehormatan Notaris? Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 10(7), 1663–1676. https://doi.org/10.24843/ks.2022.v10.i07.p17
Rizqiyah, S. A. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Akibat Kelalaiannya dalam Mendaftarkan Akta Wasiat. Jurnal Rechtens, 10(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v10i2.1087
Romauli, M. A., Sulistyarini, R., & Susilo, H. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Perdata Notaris Atas Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Yang Cacat Dalam Komparisi. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 4(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v4n1.p137-159
Rosadi, A. G. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Sengketa Para Pihak Terkait Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Yang Dibuatnya. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 5(2), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.228
Saly, J. N., Retaly, A. T., Shindy, F., Wathan, B. A., Nathanael, D., Marcellino, J., & Widjaja, J. M. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(20), 347–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416104
Saputra, D., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2017). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Bagi Notaris/PPAT Dalam Menjalankan Tupoksinya Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Kriminalisasi Berdasarkan Kode Etik. Jurnal Akta, 4(3), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v4i3.1807
Sari, C. I., & Priandhini, L. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Peran Notaris/PPAT Pada Kasus Pemindahan Aset Nirina Zubir. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 9(6), 3211–3221. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v9i6
Sofwan, S., & Purnawan, A. (2018). The Responsibility of Public Notary in Case of Ethical Code Violation. Jurnal Akta, 5(2), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i2.3224
Subagja, A. O., & Priyana, P. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris Tinjauan Kasus Mafia Tanah Nirina Zubir. Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 9(5), 2141–2152. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v9i5
Theixar, R. N., & Dharmawan, N. K. S. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Menjaga Keamanan Digitalisasi Akta. Acta Comitas, 6(01), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i01.p01
Wibowo, R. O., & Aminah, A. (2023). Implementasi Peraturan Kode Etik Notaris dalam Menjalankan Profesi Kepada Masyarakat. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 2143–2150. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3561
Wiradiredja, H. S. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Yang Didasarkan Pada Keterangan Palsu Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Dan KUHP. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 32(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v32i1.90
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Kamran, Zainuddin, Sufirman Rahman, Mulyati Pawennei
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
