Execution of State Administrative Judicial Decisions a Mirror of the Authority Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2571Keywords:
state administrative judicial decisions, execution process, judicial authority, court's authority administrative lawAbstract
Objective: This study aims to examine the significance and effectiveness of the execution of state administrative judicial decisions as a reflection of the authority of the court. It delves into understanding how the execution process mirrors the court's capacity to ensure compliance with its decisions within the state administrative framework.
Theoretical Framework: Drawing upon legal theories of administrative law and judicial authority, this research situates itself within the context of the separation of powers doctrine and the judicial function in administrative matters. It also explores concepts of legal compliance, the role of courts in decision enforcement, and the impact of administrative judicial decisions on governance.
Methodology: The study adopts a qualitative approach, utilizing case studies and legal analysis to investigate the execution process of state administrative judicial decisions. It involves in-depth examination of court rulings, judicial proceedings, and administrative actions taken post-decision. Interviews with legal experts and stakeholders involved in execution processes supplement the analysis.
Results and Conclusion: The findings showcase the pivotal role of the execution process in reflecting the authority and efficacy of the court within the state administrative system. The study unveils the challenges and successes in implementing administrative judicial decisions, highlighting areas of compliance and resistance. It concludes by discussing the implications of these results for the authority of the court in the administrative context.
Originality/Value: This research contributes to the understanding of the correlation between the execution of state administrative judicial decisions and the authority of the court. It fills a gap in scholarly literature by offering insights into the practical manifestations of judicial authority in administrative matters, shedding light on the complexities, challenges, and opportunities inherent in ensuring compliance with administrative court rulings.
References
UU no. 5 of 1986, Law no. 9 of 2004, Law no. 51 of 2009.
UU no. 30 of 2014, PERMA No. 1 of 2019, SEMA No. 2 of 2019
Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna, his book Actions Against the Law by the Government/Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad from the Perspective of the Law on Government Administration, Yogyakarta Deepublish, 2018
De Waard, B. Beginselen van Behoorlijke Rechtspleging, Met Name In het Administrative Process. Zwolle: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, 1987.
Friedman, Lawrence M. American Law: An Introduction. Translation of American Law: An Introduction, 2nd Edition, Translated by: Wisnu Basuki, Jakarta: Tatanusa, 2001.
Please, M. Yahya. Scope of Execution Issues in the Civil Sector. Jakarta PT. Gramedia, 1989.
Pangaribuan, Luhut M.P., Criminal Procedure Code: Advocate's Official Letter in Court. Jakarta: Papas Sinar Sinanti, 2014. Sarwono. Civil Procedure Law in Theory and Practice. Jakarta: Sinar Graphics, 2011.
Simanjuntak, Enrico. State Administrative Court Procedure Law of Transformation and Reflection. Jakarta Sinar Graphics, 2018.
Soekanto, Soerjono and Sri Mamudji. Normative Legal Research (A Brief Overview). Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2001.
Journal of Law of Peratus Vol. 4 No.2 August 2021: p. 123-140 https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.422021.123-140 140
Supomo. Civil Procedure Law of the District Court. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2004.
Subekti, R. Law of Evidence, Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita, 1983.
T., Quarter Point and Ismu Gunadi Widodo. State Administrative Law and State Administrative Court. Jakarta Prenada Media, 2011.
Utrecht, E. Introduction to Indonesian Law. Jakarta: N.V. Publishing and Indonesian Book Hall, 1953.
Milky Way, Muhammad Adiguna. Discourse on the Optimization of Electronic Justice in the Process of Executing Court Decisions in the State Administrative Court Environment. Paper presented at the 2021 IKAHI Anniversary Celebration.
Unpublished Papers. Chariah, Anggita et.al. Implementation of the Merit System for State Civil Apparatuses in Indonesia. Journal of Borneo Administrator, Vol. 16 No. 3, December 2020.
HR, Ridwan. Some Notes About State Administrative Courts. Justice Forum No. 22 Year II, 17 February 1994.
Murphy, James Bernard The Lawyer and the Layman: Two Perspectives on the Rule of Law. The Review of Politics No. 68 (2006). pp. 101-131. Rechtspraak in Nederland, accessed from https://www.rechtspraak.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/R002-Rechtspraakin-Nederland.pdf
Soleh, Mohammad Afifudin. Execution of State Administrative Court Decisions with Permanent Legal Force. Justice Forum Journal of Law Science February 2018.
Julius. "Discourse on State Execution Institutions in Law Enforcement in Indonesia", Journal of Administrative Law, Volume 1 Number 1, February 2018.
https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2020/04/27/institution-perdinding-ke believedanpublic-makin-dipertaruhkan/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elvi Susanti Syam, H. Edi Supriyanto, Andi Hartawati, Sumiyati B.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
