INSIGHTS INTO GREEN TAX AMONGST SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISE OWNERS IN SOUTH AFRICA: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i4.1305Keywords:
green tax, small medium enterprises, environmentAbstract
Objective: This study sought to explore how the owners of small medium enterprises in South Africa, understood green tax and the factors influencing tax compliance.
Methods: Using a qualitative research design, data was obtained from a sample of 12 owners of small medium enterprises, who voluntarily consented to participate in the study. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews, using a virtual platform due to COVID-19 regulations. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
Results: Five broad themes emerged from this inquiry which revolved on how business owners understand green tax, factors affecting green tax compliance and the strategies to ensure green tax compliance amongst small medium enterprises.
Conclusion: The study found that participants were in favour of green taxes which reflected a commitment to environmental protection. However, concerns regarding how the government utilised green taxes to ensure environmental protection emerged and consumers were found to be reluctant to pay higher premiums for green products, which affected overall tax compliance.
Research implications: Greater education regarding the salience and value of green taxes amongst the owners of small medium enterprises is important. More research related to how to ensure green tax compliance and the role small medium enterprises play in green tax compliance will strengthen compliance and enable environmental sustainability.
Originality/value: The study contributes to understanding the reasons behind a lack of compliance with regards to green taxes amongst small medium enterprises.
References
Agustinus, L.J., Samekto, F.A., & Ispriyarso, B. (2023). Towards a Fairer Future: Examining Environmental Permits in Indonesia and Sweden Through the Lens of Sustainable Development and Equity. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(2), 3.
Alm, J. (2019). What motivates tax compliance? . Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), 353-388.
Alm, J. a. T., B. (2011). Do ethics matter? tax compliance and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 635-651.
Baranzini, A., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Carattini, S., Howarth, R. B., Padilla, E.,& Roca, J. (2017). Carbon pricing in climate policy: seven reasons, complementary instruments, and political economy considerations. Wires Climate Change Review, 8(4), 11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.462
Bhanot, N., Paruchuri, V. R., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2015). Enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing: results from a survey of researchers and industry professionals. Procedia CIRP, 29, 562-567. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.036.
Bird, R. (2014). Taxation and development: What have we learned from fifty years of research? Public Finance and Management, 13(4), 266-288.
Braithwaite, V. (2016). Taxing democracy. Taxing democracy understanding tax avoidance and evasion: Routledge.
Cassells, S. L. (2011). SMEs and environmental responsibility: Do Actions Reflect Attitudes? . Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(3), 447-457.
Christensen, A. L., Weihrich, S. G., & Newman, M. G. (1994). The effect of education on perceptions of tax fairness. Advances in Taxation, 6, 63-94.
Creswell, J. W. (2019). Tax morale affects tax compliance: Evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 70(3), 447-457.
Dangelico, R. M. a. V., D. (2017). Green marketing: An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165(1), 1263-1279. .
Devos, K. (2014). Penalties and Sanctions for Environmental regulation Offences in New Zealand: Implications for Taxpayer Compliance. New Zealand Journal of Environmental Regulation Law and Policy, 10(3), 212-224.
Endriana, L., Hartono, D., & Irawan, T. (2016). Green economy priority sectors in Indonesia: a SAM approach. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 18(1), 115-135.
Fagariba, C. (2016). Perceptions of Causes of SMEs and Traders Tax Evasion: A Case of Accra Metropolis, Ghana. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(2), 17-39.
Fjeldstad, O.-H., Sjursen, I. H., & Ali, M. (2013). Factors Affecting Tax Compliant Attitude in Africa: Evidence from Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and South Africa. Paper presented at the Centre for the Study of African Economies 2013 Conference, Oxford University.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4 ed.): Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Frankel, J. (2018). Environmental Effects of International Trade. HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series. (RWP09-006). Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Hair, J. F., Black, B. J., Babin, R. E., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. . (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7 ed.): Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. .
Hillary, R. (2014). Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 561-569.
Hoogendoorn, B., Guerra, D., & van der Zwan, P. (2015). What drives environmental practices of SMEs? Small Business Economics, 44(4), 759-781.
Isamu, M. (2012). The welfare effects of environmental taxation on a green market where consumers emit a pollutant. Environmental and Resource Economics, 52(1), 13-20.
Ivanova, Y. (2017). The green economy model: A promise or a reality for the Latin-American countries? International Politics Reviews, 5(1), 13-20.
Jovita, O. U., Chibuzor, A. A., & Onyemachi, U. C. (2019). Green management and organisational effectiveness. Strategic Journal of Business and Social Science, 2, 1-23.
Kalidin, U. (2017). An exploration of the views of manufacturing small and medium enterprise owners with regards to green tax incentives in the eThekwini region of KwaZulu-Natal. (Degree of Master of Accounting). Durban University of Technology, Durban.
Kautto, P. (2016). New instruments – old practices? The implications of environmental management systems and extended producer responsibility for design for the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(6), 377-388.
Kirchler, E. (2017). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
Kirchler, E., Kogler, C., & Muehlbacher, S. (2014). Cooperative tax compliance: From deterrence to deference. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 87-92.
Koirala, S. (2018). Inclusive solutions for the green transition. Paper presented at the Paris: OECD.
Lago-Peñas, I. a. L.-P., S. (2010). The determinants of environmental regulation in comparative perspective: Evidence from European countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 437-453.
Levinson, A. (2017). The Tax Policy Briefing Book: A citizens' guide for the 2015 election and beyond.
Li, X., Du, J., & Long, H. (2019). Dynamic analysis of international green behavior from the perspective of the mapping knowledge domain. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(6), 6087-6098.
Loknath, Y. a. A. A., B. (2017). Green management – concepts and strategies. Paper presented at the National Conference on Marketing and Sustainable Development, Rajampet, Andhra Pradesh India, .
Madsen, H. a. U., J. (2014). Integrating environmental and stakeholder management. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.279
Martinez-Fernandez, C. a. W., T. (2018). Green Tax Policy in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Countries.
Mcsweeney, R. a. T., J. (2018). The Carbon Brief Profile: South Africa. Retrieved from https://www.carbonbrief.org/the-carbon-brief-profile-south-africa6/28/2020
Moutinho, V., Madaleno, M., Robaina, M., & Villar, J. (2017). Advanced scoring method of eco-efficiency in European cities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 3(6), 1-12.
Olatunji, T. E. a. O., C. O. (2015). Olatunji, T. E. and Olaoye, C. O. International Journal in Management and Social Science, 15(1), 16.
Pettinger, T. (2019). Tax on Negative Externality. Retrieved from https://www.economicshelp.org/micro-economic-essays/marketfailure/tax-negative-externality/6/28/2020
Pourkarimi, E. a. H., Y. (2017). Study of green tax policies and its impact on the environment of Iran. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 4(5), 21-34.
Sa´nchez-Medina, A., Romero-Quintero, L., & Sosa-Cabrera, S. (2014). Environmental management in small and medium-sized companies: an analysis from the perspective of the theory of planned behavior. Plos One, 9(2), 1-12.
Sáez-Martínez, F. J., Díaz-García, C., & González-Moreno, Á. (2016). Factors promoting environmental responsibility in European SMEs: The effect on performance. Sustainability, 8(9), 1-15.
Salgado, E.G., & da Silva Franchi, R.A. (2023). Green Technologies: The Role of Green Patents for Innovation, Preservation and Sustainable Development. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 17(8), e03331-e03331.
Schabmann, A. (2013). Powerful authorities and trusting citizens: The Slippery Slope Framework and tax compliance in Italy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3(1), 13.
Schurink, W., Fouché, C. B., & De Vos, A. S. (2011). Qualitative data analysis and Interpretation in research at grass roots (4th ed ed.): Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Shafie-Pour-Motlagh, M. a. F., M. M. (2017). An environmental and economic analysis for reducing energy subsidies. International Journal of Environmental Research, 1(2), 150-162.
Shrivastava, P. (2015). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16(183), 200.
Tetley, S. (2016). Why the Big 5? Understanding UK Seafood Consumer Behaviour.
Torgler, B. (2013). Environmental regulation and institutions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3(2), 4.
Welman, C., Kruger, F., & Mitchell, B. (2005). Research methodology. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Akira Singh, Raisuyah Bhagwan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
