Collaborative Governance Concept on Youth Football Governance in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.909Keywords:
governance, collaborative, football, youthAbstract
Purpose: The study aimed to demonstrate general governance study development leading to collaborative governance related to youth football development to map the position of collaborative governance studies for youth football development
Theoritical framework: This study used the general governance concept leading to the collaborative governance concept related to football development. The correlation is that experts consider collaborative governance to be the exit of chronic social issues (Muslim et al., 2021). Although Indonesian football is not a chronic social issue, minimum national achievements with the resources are ought to have serious measures. Moreover, the public’s expectation for national football achievements is astronomical.
Method: This Study Literature Review (SLR) will use the Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) method. It aimed to summarize scientific evidence available concerning the research topic, identify gaps in related studies, and recommend future studies regarding the objective and results of various articles. For substance analysis use Nvivo 12, which was described in the form of a word cloud and cluster analysis. Research mapping was conducted using the Vos Viewer analysis to display the research map of football governance and its interrelationships.
Results and Conclusions: The study results showed that football governance studies are abundant in developed football countries, particularly Europe, and mostly focused on club governance, competition governance, and involvement of parties leading to football as an industrial commodity. In Indonesia, football publications merely emerged in 2000, discussing football technical issues and recommending the importance of governance studies. Further governance study development mainly discusses the relationship between the government and the federation. Thus, it is often observed from the conflict perspective.
Research implications: There are plenty of opportunities to conduct research with various study focus or concern. Several studies are recommending implementing more extensive involvement and suggesting the importance of various parties in football governance, i.e., conceptually, such studies continuously shift to be closer to the collaborative perspective.
Orginality/value: There is no study on youth football development collaborative governance. From the institutional aspect, relationships between related parties are often observed from the conflict perspective. Thus, prioritizing the collaborative governance perspective is urgent.
References
Acero, I., Serrano, R., & Dimitropoulos, P. (2017). Ownership structure and financial performance in European football. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 17(3), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2016-0146
Agus. (2023). STAKEHOLDERS MAPPING IN ELECTION MANAGEMENT IN WEST NUSA TENGGARA PROVINCE 1 INTRODUCTION Election management ( Pemilu ) with a collaborative approach called collaborative electoral governance is a necessity of the nation to improve the function of stakeh. 1–15.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Bevir, M. (2012). Governance, A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Bevir, M. (2013). A Theory of Governance. In Global, Area, and International Archive University of California Press (Vol. 15, Issue 4). The Regents of the University of California. https://doi.org/10.11436/mssj.15.250
Blackshaw, T. (2008). Contemporary community theory and football. Soccer & Society, 9(3), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970802008959
Chhotray, V., & Stoker, G. (2009). Governance Theory and Practice (T. N. P. O. B. L. GOVERNMENT (ed.); 1st ed.). PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6433-3.ch006
Colombijn, F. (2000). The Politics of Indonesian Football. Archipel, 59(1), 171–200. https://doi.org/10.3406/arch.2000.3557
Coopoo, Y., & Fortuin, C. S. (2016). The Implementation of a Football Development Policy in England : Implications for South Africa The Implementation of a Football Development Policy in England : Implications for South Africa three inter-related aims . Firstly , a brief examination of the p. January.
Dietl, H. M., Franck, E., Hasan, T., & Lang, M. (2009). Governance of professional sports leagues-Cooperatives versus contracts. International Review of Law and Economics, 29(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2008.11.001
Dima, T. (2015). The Business Model of European Football Club Competitions. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23(October 2014), 1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00562-6
Dorsey, J. M., & Sebastian, L. C. (2013). The politics of Indonesian and Turkish soccer: a comparative analysis. Soccer and Society, 14(5), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2013.792482
Dr Michaël Mrkonjic, Dr Raffaele Poli, C. B. and D. K. T. M. (2003). Global Football Development (Vol. 1, Issue October). https://resources.fifa.com/mm/document/footballdevelopment/football/02/84/68/74/globalfootballdevelopmentvol1_neutral.pdf
Ducrey, P., Ferreira, C., Huerta, G., & Marston, K. (2004). UEFA and Football Governance : A New Model Court of Arbitration for Sport Games Transfer Rules in Greece Sports Law in Brazil. The International Sports Law Journal, February, 81–84.
Farquhar, S., Machold, S., & Ahmed, P. K. (2005). Governance and football: an examination of the relevance of corporate governance regulations for the sports sector. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2005.006716
Fuller, A. (2015). Approaching football in Indonesia. Soccer and Society, 16(1), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2014.954387
Fuller, A. (2017). Soccer and the city: the game and its fans in Solo and Yogyakarta. Sport in Society, 20(5–6), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2016.1158470
Fuller, A. (2018). A matter of life and death. Nursing Older People, 17(3), 8. https://doi.org/10.7748/nop2005.05.17.3.8.c2369
Fuller, A., & Junaedi, F. (2018). Ultras in Indonesia: conflict, diversification, activism. Sport in Society, 21(6), 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1300392
Gammelsæter, H., & Senaux, B. (2013). The governance of the game: A review of the research on football’s governance. Handbook of Research on Sport and Business, January, 142–160. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781005866.00015
García, B., & Welford, J. (2015). Supporters and football governance, from customers to stakeholders: A literature review and agenda for research. Sport Management Review, 18(4), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2015.08.006
Geeraert, A., Scheerder, J., & Bruyninckx, H. (2013). The governance network of European football: Introducing new governance approaches to steer football at the EU level. International Journal of Sport Policy, 5(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2012.659750
Glaurdić, J. (2020). Football activism as political contention: Contextual determinants of membership in the association of supporters of Hajduk Split. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 55(8), 1094–1115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690219889565
Grant, W. (2007). An analytical framework for a political economy of football. British Politics, 2(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200036
Hadinata, R., Lubis, J., Setiawan, I., & Daya, J. (2023). BASIC TECHNIQUE SKILL PRACTICE MODEL FILANESIA-BASED. 1–18.
Hamil, S., Morrow, S., Idle, C., Rossi, G., & Faccendini, S. (2010). The governance and regulation of Italian football. Soccer and Society, 11(4), 373–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660971003780297
Hanberger, A. (2004). Democratic governance and evaluation. Paper Presented at the Sixth EES (European Evaluation Society) Conference, September 30 – October 2, 2004, Berlin, Germany, 24 S.
Hinca Pandjaitan. (2013). Kedaulatan Negara Versus Kedaulatan FIFA. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hinca Panjaitan. (2011). Penyelesaian Sengketa Sepakbola Profesional di Era Globalisasi Dalam Rangka Memajukan Kesejahteraan Umum di Indonesia (Suatu Kajian Hukum Tata Negara Mengenai Kedaulatan Negara versus Kedaulatan FIFA). In Desertasi UPH. Pelita Harapan.
Huang, F., Xiao, W., & Zhang, H. (2018). Not all ‘the evils of capitalism’: Match-fixing and the governance of Chinese professional football, 1994–2016. International Journal of the History of Sport, 35(2–3), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2018.1501028
Kennedy, D., & Kennedy, P. (2015). Grass-roots football, autonomous activity and the forging of new social relationships. Sport in Society, 18(4), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2015.928481
Kennedy, P. (2012). The football industry and the capitalist political economy: A square peg in a round hole? Critique, 40(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2011.640066
Kennedy, P., & Kennedy, D. (2012). Football supporters and the commercialisation of football: Comparative responses across Europe. Soccer and Society, 13(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2012.655503
Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern Governance : New Government-Society Interactions. SAGE Publications. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/indonesiau-ebooks/detail.action?docID=456783
Lock, D., Taylor, T., & Darcy, S. (2003). Identity Development: The Case of a New Football Team. 16th EASM Conference, 30–35.
Marston, K. T. (2003). UEFA and Football Governance : A New Model Court of Arbitration for Sport Games Transfer Rules in Greece Sports Law in Brazil. January 2004.
Marston, K. T., Boillat, C., & Roitman, F. (2017). Governance Relationships in Football between Management and Labour - Players, Clubs, Leagues & National Associations (Issue December). CIES - Centre International d’Etude du Sport Avenue DuPeyrou 1 CH - 2000 Neuchâtel (Suisse) Tél.
Muslim, M. A., Prasojo, E., & Jannah, L. M. (2021). Collaborative Governance for Poverty Alleviation: A Systematic Mapping Study. RUDN Journal of Public Administration, 8(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2021-8-1-20-36
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2008, June. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8
Ruta, D., Lorenzon, L., & Sironi, E. (2019). The relationship between governance structure and football club performance in Italy and England. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 10(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-10-2018-0081
Sastranegara, R. K., Juwono, V., & Zulkarnain, Z. P. (2020). Analisis Penerapan Collaborative Governance Dalam Menangani Permasalahan Match Fixing Pada Kompetisi Sepakbola Indonesia = Analysis the Implementation of Collaborative Governance in Handling Match Fixing Problems in Indonesian Football Competition.
Senaux, B. (2008). A stakeholder approach to football club governance. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 4(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2008.017655
Strezhneva, M. V. (2016). the Role of the European Union in Football Governance. Comparative Politics (Russia), 7(3(24)), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2016-7-3(24)-45-54
Sugiyama, M., Khoo, S., & Hess, R. (2017). Grassroots football development in Japan. International Journal of the History of Sport, 34(17–18), 1854–1871. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2017.1340881
Sulistiyono. (2012). Transformasi Pengelolaan Klub Sepakbola Di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Ilmu Keolahragaan Indonesia, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/miki.v2i2.2652
Suparman, Y. (2019). Kewenangan pemerintah dalam penataan dan pengembangan induk organisasi cabang olahraga sepak bola indonesia kaitannya dengan fifa.
Suwandi, A. S., Sripujiningsih, S., & Sulastri, S. (2017). Industri Sepakbola: Pengelolaan Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan (Studi Kasus Pada Klub Sepakbola Arema Cronus). Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.17977/um004v4i12017p001
Torchia, D. (2019). New models of football governance : fan-ownership in UK and Italy New models of football governance : fan-ownership in UK and Italy. February. https://doi.org/10.7433/SRECP.EA.2018.58
Tucker, L. (2020). Football capital: what is it and why is it important? Managing Sport and Leisure, 25(1–2), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2019.1644966
Zhang, J. (2020). Problems and Prospects: A Study on the Development History of Chinese Football Industry. International Journal of the History of Sport, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2020.1723552
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gunawan Achmad, Chandra Wijaya, Lina Miftahul Jannah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
