Innovative potential and problems of sustainable development of the sphere of circulation in the russian federation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v11i1.266Keywords:
Digital economy, Globalization, Innovative business model, Open innovationAbstract
Objective: The purpose of the study is to identify the potential, problems, and likely directions of innovative development of the sphere of circulation. Like other sectors of the Russian economy, it is facing increased competitive pressure from innovatively active multinational trading companies and accelerating changes in the global market environment.
Methods: The methods used in the study include general scientific methods such as situational, complex, system, tabular, and graphical methods, as well as the method of comparative analysis and index methods, such as the indices of internal innovation activity. These methods were used to collect primary information and assess the internal innovation potential of the Russian economy in the context of open innovation.
Results: This article solves the problem caused by the lack of innovative potential, knowledge, and competencies necessary for Russian companies in the sphere of circulation to apply innovative business models adapted to global changes taking place in the world economy under the influence of innovative processes.
Conclusion: The article evaluates the innovative potential of individual sectors of activity and the Russian economy as a whole, provides a comparative analysis of the innovative activity of the Russian Federation and the countries of the world, and global trends in the development of innovation and digital processes.
References
Abbate, T., Codini, A., Aquilani, B., & Vrontis, D. (2022). From knowledge ecosystems to capabilities ecosystems: When open innovation digital platforms lead to value co-creation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, 299-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00720-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00720-1
Abbate, T., Coppolino, R., & Schiavone, F. (2013). Linking entities in knowledge transfer: The innovation intermediaries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4, 233–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-013-0156-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-013-0156-5
Abuzyarova, M.A. (2015). Sushchnost upravleniya otkrytymi innovatsiyami kak sovremennoi modelyu innovatsionnogo menedzhmenta [The essence of open innovation management as a modern model of innovation management]. Voprosy Ekonomiki i Prava, 85, 98–102.
Afanasiyadis, G., & Kochubei, E.I. (2020). Innovatsionnoe razvitie i innovatsionnyi potentsial Rossii [Innovative development and innovative potential of Russia]. Modern Science, 3-4, 37–43.
Alalykin, A.V., Temnikov, D.O., & Vasilenko, A. P. (2013). Otkrytaya innovatsionnaya sistema v usloviyakh globalizatsii. Novyi vyzov dlya Rossii [An open innovation system in the context of globalization. New challenge for Russia]. V mire nauchnykh otkrytii, 8–2(44), 11–34.
Allal-Chérif, O., Bidan, M., & Makhlouf, M. (2016). Using serious games to manage knowledge and competencies: The seven-step development process. Information Systems Frontiers, 18, 1153–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9649-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9649-7
Al-Omoush, K.S., Simón-Moya, V., & Sendra-García, J. (2020). The impact of social capital and collaborative knowledge creation on e-business proactiveness and organizational agility in responding to the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.10.002
Alvarez-Meaza, I., Pikatza-Gorrotxategi, N., & Rio-Belver, R.M. (2020a). Knowledge sharing and transfer in an open innovation context: Mapping scientific evolution. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 6(4), 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040186
Alvarez-Meaza, I., Pikatza-Gorrotxategi, N., & Rio-Belver, R.M. (2020b). Sustainable business model based on open innovation: Case study of Iberdrola. Sustainability, 12(24), 10645. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410645
Andreev, O.S. (2019). Razvitie innovatsii v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Development of innovations in the context of globalization]. Finansovaya Ekonomika, 9, 127–129.
Barsegyan, N.V. (2018). Otkrytye innovatsii kak resurs upravleniya vysokotekhnologichnymi predpriyatiyami [Open innovation as a resource for managing high-tech enterprises]. Vestnik Belgorodskogo Universiteta Kooperatsii, Ekonomiki i Prava, 5(72), 118–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21295/2223-5639-2018-5-118-127
Bartoloni, E., & Baussola, M. (2018). Driving business performance: Innovation complementarities and persistence patterns. Industry and Innovation, 25(5), 505–525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2017.1327843
Bogers, M., Burcharth, A., & Chesbrough, H. (2021). Open innovation in Brazil: Exploring opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 6(1), e213. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2021.v6i1.213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2021.v6i1.213
Bostoganashvili, E.R. (2018). Mirovoi i rossiiskii rynki roznichnoi torgovli v usloviyakh tsifrovoi ekonomiki [Global and Russian retail markets in the digital economy]. Ekonomika: Vchera, Segodnya, Zavtra, 8(2A), 155–165.
Chesbrough, H. (2005) Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Global Innovation Index 2020. Russian Federation. (2020). Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020/ru.pdf
Global Innovation Index 2020. Who will finance innovation? (2020). Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4514&plang=EN
Global Innovation Index 2020 rankings. (2020). Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020-intro4.pdf
Corsi, C., & Prencipe, A. (2019). High-tech entrepreneurial firms’ innovation in different institutional settings. Do venture capital and private equity have complementary or substitute effects? Industry and Innovation, 26(9), 1023–1074. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1561358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1561358
Da Silva, M.A.P.M. (2019). Open innovation and IPRs: Mutually incompatible or complementary institutions? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(4), 248–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.010
Djellal, F., Gallouj, F., & Miles, I. (2013). Two decades of research on innovation in services: Which place for public services? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.005
Donegan, M., & Feldman, M. (2020). Institutional evolution and the collaborative development of technology transfer capabilities. International Regional Science Review, 45(6), 636-662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017620922886 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017620922886
Eremeeva, N.V., & Panyukova, V.V. (2020). Prospective directions for research in the field of retail trade: Digitalization and omnichannel systems. Economic Systems, 13(4), 161–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29030/2309-2076-2020-13-4-161-170
European Patent Office. (2021). Patent applications to the European Patent Office. Eurostat. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/product/page/SDG_09_40
Filippov, D.I. (2018). Finansovye innovatsii i tsifrovaya transformatsiya biznes sredy [Financial innovation and digital transformation of the business environment]. Mezhdunarodnaya Torgovlya i Torgovaya Politika, 3, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2018-3-31-50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2018-3-31-50
Gamanov, E.I. (2016). Marketingovye i organizatsionnye innovatsii v roznichnoi torgovle [Retail marketing and organizational innovation]. Ekonomika i Sotsium, 12–1(31), 759–766.
Gershman, M., Roud, V., & Thurner, T.W. (2019). Open innovation in Russian state-owned enterprises. Industry and Innovation, 26(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1496815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1496815
Gimenez-Fernandez, E.M., Bogers, M., & Sandulli, F. (2019). How the diversity of cooperation partners affects startups’ innovation performance: An analysis of the role of cooperation breadth in open innovation. In G. Rexhepi, R. Hisrich and V. Ramadani (Eds.), Open innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 9-35). Cham: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16912-1_2
Giusti, J.D., Alberti, F.G., & Belfanti, F. (2020). Makers and clusters. Knowledge leaks in open innovation networks. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.04.001
Golovina, T.A., Polyanin, A.V., & Avdeeva, I.L. (2019). Razvitie tsifrovykh platform kak faktor konkurentosposobnosti sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh sistem [Development of digital platforms as a factor in the competitiveness of modern economic systems]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika, 14(4), 551–564. https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2019-4-551-564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2019-4-551-564
Grasmik, K.I. (2010). The present and the future of the open innovation conception in Russia: Regional approach. Innovatsii, 7, 75–77.
Hassan, M.U., & Iqbal, A. (2020). Open innovation and innovative performance of Pakistani SMEs: Moderated mediation of knowledge management capability and innovative climate. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 14(4), 962–990.
Hizam-Hanafiah, M., & Soomro, M. A. (2021). The situation of technology companies in industry 4.0 and the open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 7(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC7010034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010034
Inshakova, E.I., & Mitrofanova, I.V. (2020). Razvitie tsifrovoi ekonomiki stran BRIKS: Sostoyanie i prioritety [Development of the digital economy of the BRICS countries: State and priorities]. Ekonomika: Vchera, Segodnya, Zavtra, 10(2-1), 332–348.
Ioda, E.V. (2011). O kontseptsii otkrytykh innovatsii [On the concept of open innovation]. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy, 8, 96–101.
Iqbal, J., & Hameed, W.U. (2020). Open innovation challenges and coopetition-based open-innovation empirical evidence from Malaysia. In P. Ordoñez de Pablos, X. Zhang and K. Chui (Eds.), Innovative management and business practices in Asia (pp. 144-166). IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1566-2.ch008
Isaksen, A., Langemyr Eriksen, E., & Rypestøl, J.O. (2020). Regional industrial restructuring: Asset modification and alignment for digitalization. Growth and Change, 51(4), 1454–1470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12444
Isaksen, A., Trippl, M., Kyllingstad, N., & Rypestøl, J.O. (2021). Digital transformation of regional industries through asset modification. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 31, 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-12-2019-0140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-12-2019-0140
Janssen, M.J., Bogers, M., & Wanzenböck, I. (2020). Do systemic innovation intermediaries broaden horizons? A proximity perspective on R&D partnership formation. Industry and Innovation, 27(6), 605–629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1618701
Karashchuk, O., Nusratullin, I., Tretyakov, V., Shmatov, M., & Rezvan, A. (2019). Retail chains in Russia: Some aspects of state regulation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 10(4), 1258–1265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.4(42).25
Kirko, V.I., Popodko, G.I., & Goloushkin, R.D. (2012). The mechanism of implementing the business model of open innovation for the involvement of potential of a closed city in the innovative development of the region. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 5(7), 978–987.
KOF Swiss Economic Institute. (n.d.). KOF Globalisation Index. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich. Retrieved from https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kof-globalisation-index.html/
Komarcheva, O., & Lysenko, E. (2020). Trade and service industry: Readiness analysis for digital transformation. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic Sciences, 2020(3(17)), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2020-5-3-375-386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2020-5-3-375-386
Kudryavtseva, S.S. (2018). Digitalization of economy in open national innovation systems. Actual Problems of Economics and Management, 4(20), 76–81.
Lestari, E.D. (2020). Is co-working increase survivability? Study on how collaborating and networking facilitates open innovation process for startups. International Journal of New Media Technology, 7(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.31937/IJNMT.V7I1.1288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31937/ijnmt.v7i1.1288
Manceau, D., Moatti, V., Fabbri, J., Kaltenbach, P.-F., & Bagger-Hansen, L. (2011). Open innovation – What behind the buzzword; Analysing what open innovation changes in the way companies innovate in terms of partner relationships. i7 Institute for Innovation and Competitiveness - ESCP Europe.
Mayorova, A.N., Panasenko, S.V., Nikishin, A.F., Ivanov, G.G., & Mayorova, E.A. (2018). Analyzing regional differences in the condition and development of trade in Russia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(2), 927–938. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(30) DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(30)
Nalivaichenko, E.V. (2019). Razvitie tsifrovoi ekonomiki v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Development of the digital economy in the context of globalization]. Simferopol: IT “Arial”.
Ode, E., & Ayavoo, R. (2020). The mediating role of knowledge application in the relationship between knowledge management practices and firm innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(3), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002
Olifirov, A.V., Makoveichuk, K.A., & Petrenko, S.A. (2019). Transformatsiya biznes-modelei v usloviyakh tsifrovoi ekonomiki [Transforming business models in the digital economy]. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 7(4), 85-91.
Panasenko, S.V. (2019). Role and importance of neurotechnologies in development of Russian Economy. In V. A. Trifinov (Ed.), Contemporary issues of economic development of Russia: Challenges and opportunities: Vol. 59. European proceedings of social and behavioural sciences (pp. 711-717). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.04.76 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.04.76
Panasenko, S.V., Cheglov, V.P., Ramazanov, I.A., Krasil’nikova, E.A., Stukalova, I.B., & Shelygov, A.V. (2021). Improving the innovative development mechanism of the trade sector. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 11(1), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.51847/ZBHKEIPWKB DOI: https://doi.org/10.51847/ZbHKEiPwkb
Patra, S.K., & Krishna, V.V. (2015). Globalization of R&D and open innovation: Linkages of foreign R&D centers in India. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 1, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0008-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-015-0008-6
Pinkow, F., & Iversen, J. (2020). Strategic objectives of corporate venture capital as a tool for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 6(4), 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040157
Prokhorova, I.S. (2020). Tekhnologicheskii potentsial razvitiya innovatsionnoi ekonomiki v Rossii: Predely i ogranicheniya shestogo tekhnologicheskogo uklada [Technological potential for the development of an innovative economy in Russia: The limits and limitations of the sixth technological order]. Vestnik Universiteta, 2, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-2-68-75 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2020-2-68-75
Ramazanov, I.A., Ramazanov, S.A., Panasenko, S.V., Mayorova, E.A., & Nikishin, A.F. (2019). Prospects for the development of online trade in the Russian Federation in the context of globalization and the information society establishment. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 4413–4424. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B3328.078219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B3328.078219
Rospatent. (n.d.). Statistika [Statistics]. Retrieved from https://rospatent.gov.ru/ru/about/stat
Rosstat. (2021a). Informatsionnoye obshchestvo [Information society]. Retrieved from https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/14478
Rosstat. (2021b). Nauka i innovatsii [Science and innovation]. Retrieved from https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/14477
Rosstat. (2021c). Tekhnologicheskoye razvitiye otrasley ekonomiki [Technological development of economic sectors]. Retrieved from https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/11189
Sannikova, K.A., & Shevyakova, E.V. (2020). Teoreticheskie aspekty perekhoda kompanii roznichnoi torgovli ot multikanalnoi k om-nikanalnoi modeli [Theoretical aspects of the transition of retailers from multichannel to omnichannel model]. Modern Science, 6-1, 187–197.
Sannikova, K.A., Larionova, M.Y., & Shevyakova, E.V. (2020). Prakticheskie aspekty realizatsii omnikanalnoi strategii na rossiiskikh predpriyatiyakh roznichnoi torgovli. [Practical aspects of omnichannel strategy implementation at Russian retail enterprises]. Modern Science, 9-2, 98–105.
Schnorr, Z.P. (2018). Innovation in retail as a factor of increasing competitiveness in the context of globalization of the economy. Ekonomika i Upravleniye: Teoriya i Praktika, 4(4-1), 73–81.
Sidorov, E.A. (2019). iBeacon kak instrument omnikanalnogo marketinga v sfere roznichnoi torgovli [iBeacon as an omnichannel marketing tool for retail]. Innovatsii i Investitsii, 4, 139–142.
Skordoulis, M., Ntanos, S., Kyriakopoulos, G. L., Arabatzis, G., Galatsidas, S., & Chalikias, M. (2020). Environmental innovation, open innovation dynamics and competitive advantage of medium and large-sized firms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 6(4), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040195
Spartak, А.N. (2018). Effects of digital transformation on international trade. Rossiyskiy vneshneekonomicheskii Vestnik, 5, 7–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2018-2-5-21
Tronina, I.A., Tatenko, G.I., & Grekova, A.E. (2020). Innovatsionnaya infrastruktura kak draiver razvitiya regiona [Innovative infrastructure as a driver of regional development]. Vestnik VGU. Seriya: Ekonomika i Upravleniye, 3, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.17308/econ.2020.3/3109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17308/econ.2020.3/3109
Vanhaverbeke, W., & Roijakkers, N. (2015). Open innovation. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Wiley Encyclopedia of Management (pp. 1-6). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom130063
Volodko, V.F. (2020). Innovative models of enterprise marketing activity. Science & Technique, 19(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2020-19-2-130-138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2020-19-2-130-138
Yoo, I.-J., Seo, B.-G., & Park, D.-H. (2018). The role of open innovation for SME’s R&D success. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 24, 89–117.
Zapata-Cantu, L. (2021). Boosting innovation in emerging markets: the moderating role of human capital. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(3), 604–624. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-01-2019-0015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-01-2019-0015
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ibragim Ramazanov, Svetlana Panasenko, Alla Stolyarova, Elena Mayorova, Alexander Nikishin, Tatyana Pankina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
