A machine learning based approach to identify key drivers for improving corporate’s esg ratings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v11i1.242Keywords:
ESG Investing, ML model, Socially responsible investing, Sustainable investing, Green financeAbstract
Investors increasingly non-financial factors as part of their risk analysis process and growth assessments of corporates. Machine learning (ML) models for predicting ESG scores are an extremely useful tool to help investors make more informed decisions on their portfolios. Such a tool with wide-encompassing alternative data can be useful to the investors. The use of such datasets and machine learning models for ESG ratings can continuously improve the accuracy and reliability of those models. Using machine learning algorithms to identify key drivers of ESG ratings is an effective way of improving portfolio performance. Although the current state of ESG ratings is relatively static, data collection and mapping methodologies are evolving. As more data becomes available, the noise in ESG factors will become less important.
This unique document provides a machine learning algorithm for predicting an ESG rating based on a company's financial and non-financial attributes. The financial and non-financial attributes of corporations are extracted from Moody's Orbis and Ratings from S&P. The objective here is to predict the ESG rating of companies where the ESG rating is not easily accessible. At the same time, this approach would allow investors to have a suitable framework for investments based on ESG ratings. With the latest financial and non-financial disclosure by a corporate an ESG score can be predicted which can be used to identify its riskiness with a corresponding increase/decrease of ESG score.
References
“Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A., and Tarelli, A. (2021). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics”
“Bannier, C. E., Bofinger, Y., and Rock, B. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and credit risk. Finance Research Letters, 44(November 2020).”
“Barros, V., Matos, P. V., Sarmento, J. M., and Vieira, P. R. (2022). M&A activity as a driver for better ESG performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175(November 2021):121338.”
“Becker, M. G., Martin, F., and Walter, A. (2021). Fostering the Power of ESG Transparency: The Effect of Sustainability Labels on Mutual Funds and Individual Investors. SSRN Electronic Journal, (November 2021):1–6.”
“Broadstock, D. C., Matousek, R., Meyer, M., and Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Does corporate social responsi- bility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 119(July 2019):99–110.”
“Champagne, C., Coggins, F., and Sodjahin, A. (2021). Can extra-financial ratings serve as an indicator of ESG risk? Global Finance Journal, (March):100638.”
“Chen, H. Y. and Yang, S. S. (2020). Do Investors exaggerate corporate ESG information? Evidence of the ESG momentum effect in the Taiwanese market. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 63(October 2019):101407.”
“Egorova, A. A., Grishunin, S. V., and Karminsky, A. M. (2022). The Impact of ESG factors on the performance of Information Technology Companies. Procedia Computer Science, 199:339–345.”
“Feng, J., Goodell, J. W., and Shen, D. (2021). ESG rating and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, (September):102476.”
“Gangi, F., Mustilli, M. and Varrone, N. (2018). The impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) knowledge on corporate financial performance: evidence from the European banking industry. Journal of Knowledge Management.”
“Fiaschi, D., Giuliani, E., Nieri, F., and Salvati, N. (2020). How bad is your company? Measuring corporate wrongdoing beyond the magic of ESG metrics. Business Horizons, 63(3):287–299.”
“Huang, Q., Li, Y., Lin, M., and McBrayer, G. A. (2022). Natural disasters, risk salience, and corporate ESG disclosure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 72(December 2021):102152.”
“Jarjir, S. L., Nasreddine, A., and Desban, M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility as a common risk factor. Global Finance Journal, (December 2019):100577.”
“Li, H., Zhang, X., and Zhao, Y. (2022). ESG and Firm’s Default Risk. Finance Research Letters, (Jan- uary):102713.”
“Ng, A. C. and Rezaee, Z. (2020). Business sustainability factors and stock price informativeness. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64(November 2019):101688.”
“Rajesh, R., Rajeev, A., and Rajendran, C. (2021). Corporate social performances of firms in select developed economies: A comparative study. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, (November):101194.”
“Sabbaghi, O. (2022). The impact of news on the volatility of ESG firms. Global Finance Journal, 51(De- cember 2019):100570.”
“Singhania, D. M. and Saini, D. N. (2022). Systems approach to environment, social and governance (ESG): Case of Reliance industries. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3(November 2021):103–117.”
“Wong, J. B. and Zhang, Q. (2022). Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels. British Accounting Review, 54(1):101045.”
“Wong, W. C., Batten, J. A., Ahmad, A. H., Mohamed-Arshad, S. B., Nordin, S., and Adzis, A. A. (2021). Does ESG certification add firm value? Finance Research Letters, 39(November 2019):101593.”
“Yoo, S. and Managi, S. (2022). Disclosure or action: Evaluating ESG behavior towards financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 44(November 2020):102108.”
“Valeria D’Amato , Rita D’Ecclesia and Susanna Levantesi(2021). Fundamental ratios as predictors of ESG scores: a machine learning approach. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10203-021-00364-5.”
“Roy Cerqueti, Rocco Ciciretti, Ambrogio Dalò and Marco Nicolosi(2022). Mitigating Contagion Risk by ESG Investing. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3805.”
“Xiangjun Hong, Xian Lin, Laitan Fang, Yuchen Gao and Ruipeng Li(2022). Application of Machine Learning Models for Predictions on Cross-Border Merger and Acquisition Decisions with ESG Characteristics from an Ecosystem and Sustainable Development Perspective. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2838.”
“Caterina De Lucia, Pasquale Pazienza and Mark Bartlett. Does Good ESG Lead to Better Financial Performances by Firms? Machine Learning and Logistic Regression Models of Public Enterprises in Europe.”
“Vincent Margot, Christophe Geissler, Carmine de Franco and Bruno Monnier. ESG Investments: Filtering versus Machine Learning Approaches https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.07477.”
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dwijendra Dwivedi, Saurabh Batra, Yogesh Kumar Pathak

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.