The Influence of Social Networks on the System of Public Administration, Law and Order, and the Judicial System




social networks, netocracy, netocratic public management, digitalization (digitalization), virtual middle, information and communication technologies


Objective: This article examines the theoretical foundations and practical implications of social networks in the institutional landscape of public administration, law enforcement, and judicial power. It employs the paradigm of netocracy institutionalism to assess the multifaceted influence of social networks and the need for new concepts to understand the complexities of today's communication society.


Methods: The research employs a systematic approach, drawing from theories like netocracy, e-government, legal field theory, and concepts related to internet communications and the information society. It utilizes structural-functional, institutional, and interdisciplinary approaches to analyze the role of social networks in public policy and modern political communication.


Results: Social networks play a pivotal role in modern public administration, with an increasing reliance on information and communication technologies. The notion of e-government encompasses activities based on these technologies, including providing services, information exchange, public procurement, and more. A broader view of e-government focuses on transforming internal and external interactions for optimizing management and enhancing public services, thus promoting electronic democracy. The concept of netocratic public management emphasizes transparency, cooperation, and public involvement in decision-making, aligning with the principles of the information society. Netocracy, represented by a technologically adept elite, influences and manipulates public consciousness and behavior through advanced communication abilities in the digital realm.

Conclusions: The study underscores the growing significance of social networks in modern governance, with netocracy emerging as a powerful and influential force in the digital age. It also highlights the need for new social structures and concepts to grasp the complexities of today's communication society. In this context, social networks have become indispensable tools for communication between governments and citizens, offering extensive opportunities for interaction and engagement.


Bard, A., Soderqvist, J. (2002). Netocracy: The New Power Elite and Life After Capitalism. FT Press.

Bondarenko, S., Makeieva, O., Usachenko, O., Veklych, V., Arifkhodzhaieva, T., Lernyk, S. (2022). The legal mechanisms for information security in the context of digitalization. Journal of Information Technology Management, 14, 25-58. Available at:

Bonson, E., Ratkai, M., Royo, S. (2015). Citizens’ engagement on local governments Facebook Sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 52-62.

Bourgon, J. (2011). A New Synthesis of Public Administration: Serving in the 21st Century. Queen's School of Policy Studies.

Cabinet Office (2014). Social Media Guidance for Civil Servants: October 2014. Available at: social-media-guidance-for-civil-servants

Criado, J. V. (2020). Delivering public services through social media in European local governments. An interpretative framework using semantic algorithms. Local Government Studies, 47(2), 253-275. Available at: 03930.2020.1729750

Daxton, S. (2016). Social Media and the Law. A guidebook for Communication Students and Professionals. Routledge.

Fang, Z. (2002). E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 10, 1-22.

Garcia, R., Hoffmeister, T. (2022). Social Media Law in a Nutshell (Nutshells). West Academic Publishing.

Gómez Díaz de León, C., de la Garza-Montemayor, D. J. (2023). Social networks and public administration: The challenges and opportunities of governments in the era of digital communication. Universitas XX1, 39, 79-101. Available at:

Graves, L., Glisson, W., Choo, K. (2020). LinkedLegal: Investigating social media as evidence in courtrooms. Computer Law & Security Law, 38, 105408.

Hoffmeister, T. (2014). Social Media in the Courtroom: A New Era for Criminal Justice? Praeger.

Houser, K. (2022). Legal Guide to Social Media, Second Edition: Rights and Risks for Businesses, Entrepreneurs, and Influencers. Allworth.

Hubanova, T., Shchokin, R., Hubanov, O., Antonov, V., Slobodianiuk, P., & Podolyaka, S. (2021). Information technologies in improving crime prevention mechanisms in the border regions of southern ukraine. Journal of Information Technology Management, 13, 75-90. Available at:

Janoski-Haehlen, Emily M. (2011). The Courts Are All A 'Twitter': The Implications of Social Media Use in the Courts, 46 Val. U. L. Rev. 43. Available at: /iss1/2

Johnston J (2017). Courts’ Use of Social Media: A Community of Practice Model. International Journal of Communication, 11, 669-683.

Klang, M., Nolin, J. (2011). Disciplining Social Media: An Analysis of Social Media Policies in 26 Swedish Municipalities. First Monday, 16(8). Available at:

Koliba, C., Meek, J., Zia, A. (2018). Governance Networks in Public Administration and Public Policy. Routledge.

Kumar, S., & Yadav, S. K. (2023). The Role of Social Entrepreneurship in Addressing Global Social Challenges. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(6), e1190. Available at:

Lipschultz, J. H. (2021). Social Media Law and Ethics. Routledge.

Liu, S. (2011). Changes in Power Structure in the Network Era. Jianghuai Tribune, 5, 15-19.

Luttrell, R., Wallace, A. (2021). Social Media and Society: An Introduction to the Mass Media Landscape. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Lytvyn, N., Andrushchenko, H., Zozulya, Y. V., Nikanorova, O. V., Rusal, L. M. (2022). Enforcement of court decisions as a social guarantee of protection of citizens rights and freedoms. Prawo i Wiez, 2022(39), 80-102. Available at:

Mangan, D., Gillies, L. (2017). The legal challenges of social media. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Manoharan, A. P., Ingrams, A., Kang, D., Zhao, H. (2021). Globalization and worldwide best practices in e-government. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(6), 465-476.

Margretts, H., John, P., Hale, S., Yasseri, T. (2015). Political Turbulence: How Social Media Shape Collective Action. Princeton University Press.

McDonagh, J.A. (2005). Strategic advisory note on “e-governmen” and the challenge of change in public sector management. Bratislava: UNDP Bra tislava Regional Centre.

McQuiston, J., Manoharan, A. P. (2021). E-Government and information technology coursework in public administration programs in Asia. Teaching Public Administration, 39(2), 210-226.

Mergel, I. (2013). A Framework for Interpreting Social Media Interactions in the Public Sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 327-334. Available at:

Mergel, I., Bretschneider, S. (2013). A Three-Stage Adoption Process for Social Media Use in Government. Public Administration Review, 73, 390-400.

Mergel, I., Ganapati, S., Whitford, A. B. (2020). Agile: A new way of governing. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 161-165.

Mulska, O., Vasyltsiv, T., Shushkova, Y., Kloba, L., & Parfenyuk, Y. (2022). Assessment of the population's social resilience environment (the case of the carpathian region of Ukraine). Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(1), 407-421. Available at:

Pautrut, B. (2014). Political power of social media. Springer.

Pew, N. (2015). Social Media and the Dynamics of Political Campaigns: A Case Study. Journal of Political Marketing, 14(1-2), 1-22.

Pew, N. (2017). The New Digital Landscape: Politics and the Role of Social Media. In: Handbook of Research on Political Activism in the Information Age (pp. 135-156). IGI Global.

Pew, N. (2020). Online Political Communication and Social Media: An Analysis of the 2020 US Presidential Election. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 1041-1042.

Reale, G. (2014). Opportunities and differences of open government data policies in Europe. Athens Journal of Social Sciences, 1(3), 195-206.

Schoeller-Schletter, A. (n.d.). Impartiality of Judges and Social Media. Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

Semenets-Orlova, I., Shevchuk, R., Plish, B., Grydiushko, I., Maistrenko, K. (2022). Innovative approaches to development of human potential in modern public administration. Economic Affairs (New Delhi), 67(4), 915-926. Available at:

Shchokin, R., Soloviov, O., & Tantsiura, I. (2023). The Role of Public Administration in Ensuring State Security: Strategies and Mechanisms of Implementation. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(8), e1521. Available at:

Storozhenko, L. H. (2023). Netocratic vector of formation of public administration in the information society. Modernization of the system of public management and administration in Ukraine: The experience of the Republic of Latvia. Baltija Publishing.

Swann, P. (2019). Cases in Public Relations Management: The Rise of Social Media and Activism. Routledge.

Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13(2), 203-217.

Tufekci, Z. (2019). We're building a dystopia just to make people click on ads. TED Talk. Available at:

United States Office of Government Ethics (2016). The Standards of Conduct as Applied to Personal Social Media Use. Available at:

Ure, M. (2019). Social Media use in Justice Administration: disintermediation, conversation and collaboration. Global Media Journal, 17(32), 172.

Villodre, J. (2020). Redes sociales (en las administraciones públicas). EUNOMÍA. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, 19, 375-390.




How to Cite

Vasylchyshyn, O., Storozhenko, L., Babkova, T., Kuchmenko, V., & Kovalchuk, V. (2023). The Influence of Social Networks on the System of Public Administration, Law and Order, and the Judicial System. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(11), e2027.