The success of the E-voting to Enhance the Political Engagement: A Comparative Study
Keywords:e-voting, e-democracy, political engagement, elections, transparency, United Arab Emirates
Purpose: This research investigates the e-voting system in the United Arab Emirates by comparing European countries such as the UK, Switzerland, and Netherlands experiences.
Theoretical framework: The current research consists of an introduction and the definition of e-voting in addition to the advantages and risks of the e-voting system, no ultimate judgment, e-voting as a subject of structuration, legal and technical guarantees for e-voting, types, and techniques of e-voting, e-voting in Europe, and e-voting in the United Arab Emirates.
Design/Methodology/Approach: It should be noted that descriptive and analytical methods have been adopted in this study, clarifying the concept of e-voting and then addressing the advantages and risks of e-voting, in addition to comparative approach has been used to compare European countries such as UK, Switzerland, and Netherland from one side, and the United Arab Emirates from the other side.
Findings of the paper: The UAE has electronic voting systems that help empower people to vote from anywhere.
Research, Practical & Social implications: We suggest using AI in election systems to enhance public participation, empower people, and facilitate people's voting to make it easy and fast.
Originality/Value: We propose to create electronic systems for public procurement in the Emirates that do not have electronic systems for public procurement, in addition to continually introducing technical support to the employees to avoid mistakes and to enhance effectiveness and efficiency.
Agarwal, S., Haider, A., Jamwal, A., Dev, P., & Chandel, R. (2020). Biometric Based Secured Remote Electronic Voting System. 2020 7th International Conference on Smart Structures and Systems (ICSSS), 1-5.
Ahmad, M., Rehman, A.U., Ayub, N., Alshehri, M.D., Khan, M.A., Hameed, A., & Yetgin, H. (2020). Security, usability, and biometric authentication scheme for electronic voting using multiple keys. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 16.
Abasaheb, S. A., & Subashini, R. (2023). Maneuvering of Digital Transformation: Role of Artificial Intelligence in Empowering Leadership - An Empirical Overview. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(9), e1667. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i9.1667
Aboelazm, K.S. (2021) The Constitutional Framework for Public Policy in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Countries. International Journal of Public Law and Policy. 7(3), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-05-2018-0049
Aboelazm, K.S. (2022)a E-procurement in the international experience: an approach to reduce corruption in administrative contracts in Egypt. International Journal of Procurement Management. 15(3), 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2022.122570
Aboelazm, K.S. (2022)b The Role of Digital Transformation in Improving the Judicial System in the Egyptian Council of State: An Applied Study from a Comparative Perspective. Journal of Law and Emerging Technologies. 2(1), 11–50. https://doi.org/10.54873/jolets.v2i1.41
Aboelazm, K.S. (2023)a The Development of the President's Authorities in the Egyptian Constitutions, Russian Law Journal, 11(2).
Aboelazm, K.S. (2023)b The Role of Judicial Review on the Acts of Sovereignty in Egypt, International Journal of Public Law and Policy, 31(1).
Aboelazm, K.S. (2023)C Using E-Tenders in the United Arab Emirates to Enhance Transparency and Integrity, Kurdish Studies, 11(2).
Aboelazm, K.S. and Ramadan, S. (2023)D Transformation to E-Public Procurement in the United Arab Emirates in the Light of Uncitral Model Law. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(8), e1499. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i8.1499
Aboelazm, K (2023)E The Debatable Issues in the Rule of Law in British Constitutional History and the influence in the Egyptian Constitutions, International Journal of Doctrine, Judiciary and Legislation, 4(2), 521-568. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijdjl.2023.177439.1185
Ahn, B. (2022). Implementation and Early Adoption of an Ethereum-Based Electronic Voting System for the Prevention of Fraudulent Voting. Sustainability.
ALONSO, Á. I. (2009). E-PARTICIPATION AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE: A CASE
STUDY. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 4(3 (12)), 49–62.
Alvarez, R. M., Hall, T. E., & Trechsel, A. H. (2009). Internet Voting in Comparative Perspective: The Case of Estonia. PS: Political Science and Politics, 42(3), 497–505.
Arafah, B., Hasyim, M., & Kapoyos, F.E. (2021). E-democracy and the parrhesia language of netizen towards COVID-19 pandemic. Linguistics and Culture Review.
Baxter, D. J. (2017). E-GOVERNANCE AND E-PARTICIPATION VIA ONLINE CITIZEN BUDGETS AND ELECTRONIC LOBBYING: Promises and Challenges. World Affairs, 180(4), 4–24.
Boucher, S., Butler, I., de Groot, M., Lironi, E., Russack, S., Stratulat, C., Youngs, R., & Zacharzewski, A. (2019). Strengthening Digital Democracy. In Six Ideas for Rejuvenating European Democracy (pp. 10–12). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Buchstein, H. (2005). Enttäuschende Diskussion verfassungsrechtlicher Probleme von Online-Wahlen [Review of Elektronische Wahlen? Einige verfassungsrechtliche Fragen, Band 10 der Schriftenreihe der European Association of Legislation (EAL) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gesetzgebung, by U. Karpen]. Zeitschrift Für Parlamentsfragen, 36(4), 907–909.
Bund, J. (2016). Cybersecurity and democracy: Hacking, leaking and voting. European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS).
CALISTA, D. J., & MELITSKI, J. (2007). E-GOVERNMENT AND E-GOVERNANCE: CONVERGING CONSTRUCTS OF PUBLIC SECTOR INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(1/2), 87–120.
Ch, V., A, M., & A, B.S. (2022). Arduino based Electronic Voting System with Biometric and GSM Features. 2022 4th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), 685-688.
Colton, T. J., & Hale, H. E. (2009). The Putin Vote: Presidential Electorates in a Hybrid Regime. Slavic Review, 68(3), 473–503.
Damore, D. F., Waters, M. M., & Bowler, S. (2012). Unhappy, Uninformed, or Uninterested? Understanding “None of the Above” Voting. Political Research Quarterly, 65(4), 895–907.
Danielsen, C. S., & Zimmerman, M. (2005). Electronic Voting: Conflicts Within the General Public and the Disabled Community. Human Rights, 32(2), 9–11.
Daud, I.I., Sumaryana, A., Nurasa, H., & Susanti, E. (2022). Electronic Digital Identification (E-KTP) as an Element of E-Democracy in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences.
Dawes, S. S. (2008). The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E-Governance. Public Administration Review, 68, S86–S102.
Devanesan, V. V., & Chandrasekaran, P. K. A. (2011). “E-DEMOCRACY IN INDIA”-IMPLICATIONS AND IMPERATIVES. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 72(2), 395–401.
Disparte, D., & Tillemann, T. (2020). Election Integrity. In The Great Correction (pp. 18–21). New America.
Duenas-Cid, D., Janowski, T., & Krimmer, R. (2022). Trust and Distrust in e-Democracy. DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research.
Falck, O., Gold, R., & Heblich, S. (2014). E-lections: Voting Behavior and the Internet. The American Economic Review, 104(7), 2238–2265.
Fan, X., Wu, T., Zheng, Q., Chen, Y., Alam, M., & Xiao, X. (2020). HSE-Voting: A secure high-efficiency electronic voting scheme based on homomorphic signcryption. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 111, 754-762.
Gibson, R. (2001). Elections Online: Assessing Internet Voting in Light of the Arizona Democratic Primary. Political Science Quarterly, 116(4), 561–583.
Giraldo, F.D., Milton C., B., & Gamboa, C.E. (2020). Electronic Voting Using Blockchain And Smart Contracts: Proof Of Concept. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 18, 1743-1751.
Grönlund, Å. (2002). Introduction to the Special Issue on E-democracy in Practice: Methods, Infrastructures and Discourse. E-Service Journal, 2(1), 3–8.
GROSE, T. K. (2008). ELECTRONIC VOTING: Dog On It. ASEE Prism, 18(2), 20–20.
Gustafsson, P. (2002). The Order of E-Democracy: Internet and Democracy in Swedish Local Governments. E-Service Journal, 2(1), 114–132.
Hall, T. (2012). Electronic voting. In N. Kersting, M. Stein, & J. Trent (Eds.), Electronic Democracy (1st ed., pp. 153–176). Verlag Barbara Budrich.
Harfst, P., Blais, A., & Bol, D. (2018). Voting Strategically in Two-Vote Elections. In A. Blais, L. B. Stephenson, & J. H. Aldrich (Eds.), The Many Faces of Strategic Voting: Tactical Behavior in Electoral Systems Around the World (pp. 150–177). University of Michigan Press.
Hoy, C. J. (1971). Electronic Voting. American Libraries, 2(2), 148–149.
Ibrahim, M., Ravindran, K., Lee, H., Farooqui, O., & Mahmoud, Q.H. (2021). Election Block: An Electronic Voting System using Blockchain and Fingerprint Authentication. 2021 IEEE 18th International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C), 123-129.
Jackson, J. E. (1975). Issues, Party Choices, and Presidential Votes. American Journal of Political Science, 19(2), 161–185.
Judge, E. F., Pal, M., & Centre for International Governance. (2019). Election Cyber Security Challenges for Canada. In Governing Cyberspace during a Crisis in Trust: An essay series on the economic potential — and vulnerability — of transformative technologies and cyber security (pp. 16–20). Centre for International Governance Innovation.
Kaudare, A., Hazra, M., Shelar, A., & Sabnis, M.M. (2020). Implementing Electronic Voting System With Blockchain Technology. 2020 International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET), 1-9.
Kerschbaum, F., & Centre for International Governance Innovation. (2022). Security Considerations in Designing Electronic Voting. In Next-Generation Technology and Electoral Democracy: Understanding the Changing Environment (pp. 34–41). Centre for International Governance Innovation.
Kersting, N. (2012). The Future of Electronic democracy. In N. Kersting, M. Stein, & J. Trent (Eds.), Electronic Democracy (1st ed., pp. 11–54). Verlag Barbara Budrich.
Khaustova, M. (2022). The impact of e-democracy on social development in Ukraine: theoretical and practical approach. Law and innovations.
Kneuer, M. (2016). E-democracy: A new challenge for measuring democracy. International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 37(5), 666–678.
Kumari, A., Rathee, N., & Maheshwari, V. (2020). Electronic Voting Machine.
Lee, C., Chang, K., & Berry, F. S. (2011). Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 444–454.
LIM, J. H. (2010). EMPOWERING CITIZENS’ VOICES IN THE ERA OF E-GOVERNMENT: IMPLICATIONS FROM SOUTH KOREAN CASES. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 5(7 (16)), 19–31.
Markovic, A. (2022). E-democracy as a precondition of digidemocracy. Megatrend revija.
Mavriki, P., & Karyda, M. (2022). Big data analytics in e-government and e-democracy applications: privacy threats, implications and mitigation. International Journal of Electronic Governance.
McCormack, C. B. (2016). Why Use Electronic Voting? In Democracy Rebooted: The Future of Technology in Elections (pp. 6–8). Atlantic Council.
McCormack, C. B. (2016). Electronic Voting around the World. In Democracy Rebooted: The Future of Technology in Elections (pp. 9–14). Atlantic Council.
Melenchuk, A. (2021). Inclusive Local Digital Participation in Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. German Marshall Fund of the United States.
MELITSKI, J., & CALISTA, D. (2016). E-GOVERNMENT AND E-GOVERNANCE BEST PRACTICES IN CITIES AND COUNTRIES COMPARED BETWEEN 2003 AND 2012: FAD OR DIFFUSED INNOVATION? Public Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 913–948.
Mensah, I.K. (2020). Impact of Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, and Citizen Trust on the Adoption of Electronic Voting System in Ghana. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res., 16, 19-32.
Mostafa, M.M., & abdel Jalil, S. (2022). Assessing the Impact of E-Democracy on Enhancing Quality of Work Life at the Egyptian Travel Agents. International Academic Journal Faculty of Tourism and Hotel Management.
Moynihan, D. P. (2004). Building Secure Elections: E-Voting, Security, and Systems Theory. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 515–528.
Musiał-Karg, M. (2022). E-Democracy and E-Tools of citizen participation on local level in Poland. Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days.
Norris, D. F. (2010). E-Government 2020: Plus ça change, plus c’est la meme chose. Public Administration Review, 70, S180–S181.
Ohlin, T., & Hällgren, M. (2002). Internet Voting in Practice: The Case of the Umeå Student Union. E-Service Journal, 2(1), 35–61.
Olumide, S.A., Olutayo, K.B., & Adekunle, S.E. (2020). A Review of Electronic Voting Systems: Strategy for a Novel. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 12, 19-29.
Otchere-Darko, G. A. (2010). Ghana’s Fragile Elections: Consolidating African Democracy through E-Voting. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 11(2), 67–73.
Prandini, M., & Ramilli, M. (2012). A Model for E-voting Systems Evaluation Based on International Standards: Definition and Experimental Validation. E-Service Journal, 8(3), 42–72.
Pyroha, I.S., Tokarchuk, L., Perezhniak, B., Nikitenko, L., & Berch, V. (2022). E-democracy: an urgent need or a tribute to fashion? Legal analysis. Revista Amazonia Investiga.
Qu, W., Wu, L., Wang, W., Liu, Z., & Wang, H. (2020). A electronic voting protocol based on blockchain and homomorphic signcryption. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 34.
Rana, N. P., Williams, M. D., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, J. (2012). Theories and Theoretical Models for Examining the Adoption of E-Government Services. E-Service Journal, 8(2), 26–56.
Remenyi, D. (2003). e-Democracy – an invitation to i-Warfare? Journal of Information Warfare, 2(2), 128–133.
Rendon, M. (2018). How the Blockchain Can Help Venezuela’s Future Recovery: Promoting Sound Policy Foundations for Venezuela’s Postcrisis Recovery and Reform. In How the Blockchain Can Help Venezuela’s Future Recovery: Promoting Sound Policy Foundations for Venezuela’s Postcrisis Recovery and Reform (pp. 1–10). Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
Robertson, L. (2006). One Man One Vote: Trust between the Electorate, the Establishment, and Voting Technology. The Journal of Technology Studies, 32(2), 85–89.
Roztocki, N. (2022). Concepts of E-Democracy in an E-Society.
Sigelman, L., Roeder, P. W., Jewell, M. E., & Baer, M. A. (1985). Voting and Nonvoting: A Multi-Election Perspective. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 749–765.
Stromer-Galley, J. (2003). Voting and the Public Sphere: Conversations on Internet Voting. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(4), 727–731.
Subagyono, B. S. A., Astutik, S., Chumaida, Z. V., Romadhona, M. K., & Usanti, T. P. (2023). Consumer Dispute in Electronic Transactions: State Obligation and Dispute Settlement Under Indonesia Consumer Protection Law. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(10), e1240. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1240
T M, R., & Sumathi, R. (2020). Electronic Voting based on Virtual ID of Aadhar using Blockchain Technology. 2020 2nd International Conference on Innovative Mechanisms for Industry Applications (ICIMIA), 71-75.
Warf, B. (2014). Geographies of E-Government in Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of Latin American Geography, 13(1), 169–185.
WARREN, M. E. (2011). Voting with Your Feet: Exit-based Empowerment in Democratic Theory. The American Political Science Review, 105(4), 683–701.
Xu, H. (2012). Information Technology, Public Administration, and Citizen Participation: The Impacts of E-Government on Political and Administrative Processes [Review of Digital Governance: New Technology for Improving Public Service and Participation; Public Administration and Information Technology, by M. Milakovich & C. G. Reddick]. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 915–920.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Karem Sayed Aboelazm
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.