The Gratification of Sexual Services in Corruption Offenses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i8.1431Keywords:
corruption, gratification, sexual servicesAbstract
Objective: This research aims to examine in depth the legal regulations related to gratification for sexual services in the context of corruption. As well as evidence in the trial of corruption crimes.
Method: This research is included in normative juridical research. This research uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The statutory approach provides an overview of the regulation of the subject matter under study. While the concept approach will obtain an overview of the suitability of the subject matter that has been regulated in the legislation with concepts that discuss the subject matter itself.
Results: The Law No. 31/1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20/2001 on the Eradication of Corruption does not prohibit gifts to civil servants or state officials, but there are signs that must be considered regarding gratification in order to avoid the types of gratification that can be considered bribes. Corruption crimes related to gratification are expressly regulated in Article 12 b and Article 12 c of Law No. 31 of 1999 on the Amendment to Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption. Any gratification to a civil servant or state organizer is considered a bribe if it is related to his/her position and contrary to his/her obligations or duties. For gratification with a value of Rp. 10 million or more, the proof that the gratuity is not a bribe is carried out by the recipient of the gratuity (reverse proof); while those with a value of less than Rp. 10 million, the proof that the gratuity is not a bribe is carried out by the public prosecutor.
References
Adji, I. S. (2016). Corruption and Reversal of the Burden of Proof.
Akbar, M. A. (2015). Cyberbullying on Online Media (A Content Analysis Study of Cyberbullying among Teenagers on Facebook).
Ali, M. (2013). Principles, Theory and Practice of Corruption Criminal Law. Yogyakarta: UUI Press Yogyakarta.
Ali, M., Halim, A., & Permana, W. N. (2021). Differences between Bribery and Gratification: A Review of Anti-Corruption Act of Indonesia. Medico-legal Update, 21(1).
Ansori, H. (2013). Sexual Gratification in Persona Corruption. Surabaya: RA De. Rozarie.
Arsjad, M. (2021). Sexual Service Gratification as a Corruption Crime. Journal of Akta Yudisia, 3(1), 296567.
Beccaria, C. (2011). Regarding Crime and Punishment. Yogyakarta: genta publishing.
Bex, F. J. (2011). Arguments, stories and criminal evidence: A formal hybrid theory (Vol. 92). Springer Science & Business Media.
Feigenblatt, H. (2020). Breaking The Silence Around Sextortion: The Links Between Power, Sex And Corruption.
Fernando, Z. J., Purnama, P., Putra, Y. S., & Utami, R. A. (2022). Challenges and Barriers to Sexual Gratification Regulation in Indonesia. Proceeding Justicia Conference, 1, 80–93.
Hafrida, H. (2013). AJuridical Analysis of Gratification and Bribery as Corruption Crimes According to Law Number 31 of 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption. INOVATIVE| Journal of Legal Studies, 6(7).
Harefa, B., & Bazroh, N. (2022). Evidence of Sexual Gratification in the Eradication of Corruption. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 3(2), 44–52.
Hartanti, E. (2023). Corruption Offenses. Sinar Grafika.
Hutabarat, D. T. H., Delardi, E., Irwansyah, A., Bascara, D., Ansori, B., & Tanjung, F. (2022). The Eradication Of Corruption And The Enforcement Of The Law In Indonesia As Seen Through The Lens Of Legal Philosophy. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(2), 1–8.
KPK RI. (2019). Review of the Implementation of the Gratuity Article in Court Decisions (Revised Edition).
Kristanto, H., & Osmawati, Y. (2022). The Phenomenon of Sexual Gratification in Indonesia as a Form of Corruption Crime. Deviance Journal of Criminology, 6(2), 182–199.
Lindberg, H., & Stensöta, H. (2018). Corruption as exploitation: Feminist exchange theories and the link between gender and corruption. Gender and Corruption: Historical Roots and New Avenues for Research, 237–256.
Marzuki, M. (2017). Legal Research: Revised Edition. Prenada Media.
Mauliddar, N., Din, M., & Rinaldi, Y. (2017). Gratification as a Corruption Crime Related to the Report of the Gratification Recipient. Kanun Journal of Legal Studies, 19(1), 155–173.
Packer, H. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford University Press.
Sari, D. N. (2013). Corruption Crime in the Form of Sexual Gratification. Lex Crimen, 2(3).
Shidarta, S., & Irianto, S. (2011). Legal Research Methods Constellation and Reflection. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2006). Normative Legal Research Overview. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sugono, D. (2008). Big Dictionary of Indonesian Language. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa.
Syamsuddin, A. (2019). Specialized Criminal Offenses. Sinar Grafika.
Transparency International. (2023). Corruption Perception Index 2022. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2022/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
