A Review of Research on the Development of Cultural and Creative Products from the Perspective of "Intangible Cultural Heritage" Inheritance
Keywords:Elusive Cultural Heritage (ICH), cultural art, inheritance, cultural and inventive
Purpose: The development of cultural and inventive foodstuffs from the perspective of “ambiguous cultural heritage” has become the object of much study in recent years.
Theoretical Framework: Elusive cultural heritage refers to the non-material aspects of culture, for example oral traditions, performing arts, societal exercises, rituals and festivals, that are passed down from generation to generation.
Method: One of the main research focuses on this area is the role of cultural and inventive foodstuffs in promoting the preservation and transmission of elusive cultural heritage. Many scholars have argued that the marketing of cultural and inventive foodstuffs can serve as a way to increase public consciousness and interest in elusive cultural heritage and create economic opportunities for communities traditionally associated with such live out.
Results: Elusive Cultural Heritage, also known as Elusive Cultural Heritage, is a distinct form of the most important cultural and historical resources in the world. Its importance to the world's history, culture, arts, fine arts, and cultural aesthetics is very important and unique. It is also an invaluable capital of culture and art of human society.
Conclusions: In many cases, traditional knowledge found in a particular culture supports the self-identity of ethnic groups and allows members of these groups to embrace the distinctive characteristics of their culture. In this research review, we will discuss the development of cultural and inventive foodstuffs from the perspective of “ambiguous cultural heritage” inherited from previous research studies.
Akagawa, N.; Smith, L. (2018). Safeguarding Elusive Heritage: Live out and Politics; Routledge: London, UK.
D. Myers, (2016). “Heritage inventories: promoting effectiveness as a vital tool for sustainable heritage management,” Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 102–112.
Fan T., Wang H. (2022). Research of Chinese elusive cultural heritage knowledge graph construction and attribute value extraction with graph attention network. Information Processing & Management .59(1) doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102753.102753
Foster, M.D. (2015). UNESCO on the Ground. J. Folk. Res. Int. J. Folk. Ethnomusicol. 52, 143–156
Gao, X.K. (2020). Inheritance and Sharing: Research on the Value Evaluation of Elusive Cultural Heritage. Cult. Herit. 5, 1–8
Grobar, L.M. (2019). Policies to promote employment and preserve cultural heritage in the handicraft sector. Int. J. Cult. 25, 515–527.
Hang, J. (2022). Possibility of establishing “handicrafts”. Art Obs. 11, 10–12
Ji, Z.Y.; Gao, P.C. (2021). Elusive Cultural Heritage Safeguarding and the Regional Cultural Identity. Cult. Herit. 3, 18–23
Lin, X.Q. (2020). Holistic Protection: Value, Idea, Practice and Challenge: Some reflections on the innovation of cultural heritage protection. Fujian Trib. 12, 36–47
Liman, P. D., & Rifai, A. (2023). Legal Status of Children Out of Wedlock According to the Decision of the Constitutional Court in Inheritance of the Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW) System. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(3), e577. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i3.577
M. J. Delbarrio, M. Devesa, and L. C. Herrero, (2012). “Evaluating elusive cultural heritage: the case of cultural festivals,” City, Culture and Society, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 235–244.
Mei, L., & Ahmad, N. B. (2023). A Review of Current Cultural Jewellery Trend. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(5), e839. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i5.839
R. Hu, Q. Mo, Y. Xie et al., (2021). “AVMSN: An audio-visual two stream crowd counting framework under low-quality conditions,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 80500–80510.
Scovazzi, T. (2019). The UNESCO convention for the safeguarding of the Elusive Cultural Heritage. General remarks. The Legal Protection of the Elusive Cultural Heritage: A Comparative Perspective, 3-16.
Seraphin, H.; Ivanov, S.; Dosquet, F.; Bourliataux-Lajoinie, S. (2020). Archetypes of locals in destinations victim of over tourism. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 43, 283–288
Song, L. (2022). Exploration of Hong Kong’s Elusive Cultural Heritage Education from the Perspective of Critical Thinking Cultivation. Educ. Chin. After-Sch. 5, 66–76.
Wang, M. (2022). “Integration” and “Activation”: Achievements and Measurements of the inventive Transformation and Innovative development of Guizhou’s Elusive Cultural Heritage. Res. Tradit. Chin. Cult. 2, 1–11, 137.
X. Y. Zhang, Y. J. Li, J. Lin, and Y. J. Ye, (2021). “The construction of placeness in traditional handicraft heritage sites: a case study of Suzhou embroidery,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 16, pp. 9176–9176.
Y. Li, L. Xie, L. Zhang et al., (2022). “Understanding different cultural ecosystem services: an exploration of rural landscape preferences based on geographic and social media data,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 317, article 115487.
Yan, W.-J.; Chiou, S.-C. (2021). The Safeguarding of Elusive Cultural Heritage from the Perspective of Civic Participation: The Informal Education of Chinese Embroidery Handicrafts. Sustainability, 13, 4958
Zhang, K.; Zhang, M.; Law, R.; Chen, X.; Wang, Q. (2020). Impact model of tourism production and consumption in Nanjing Yunjin: The perspective of cultural heritage reproduction. Sustainability, 12, 3430
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.