Joint Collaboration of the Local Government (Regency, City, and Province) for the Successful Development in East Java Of Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1354Keywords:
development, cooperation, collaboration, local government, regional autonomyAbstract
Objective: This study aims to analyze and describe the Joint collaboration between Local Governments (Regency, City, and Province) in the context of regional development in East Java Indonesia, and evaluate the extent to which the effectiveness of this collaboration is compared to the goals and objectives that have been set.
Theoretical framework: Development is defined as an effort or series of planned growth and change efforts carried out consciously by a nation, state, and government, towards modernity in the context of nation development (Siagian, 2005. Conceptual problems of regional development have been answered through a Collaborative Governance approach which involves the participation of stakeholder interests, which have recently been developed by experts who are members of the new paradigm of public government (Osborne, 2010). According to the view of Ansell & Gash (2008), Collaborative Governance is "a governance arrangement in which one or more public institutions collectively directly involve non-state stakeholders in formal collective decision-making processes. Phillips et al. (2000), suggest defining collaboration broadly to cover a wide range of activities and relationships. Following Bardach (1998) who builds on Braun et al. (1996), collaboration is defined as a joint activity, by two or more organizations, that is intended to create public value by working together rather than separately.
Method: This type of research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. This approach was chosen to present data in a systematic, factual, and accurate manner regarding the facts in the field. The qualitative approach itself emphasizes the human element as a research instrument. By emphasizing the human element as a research instrument, it will make it easier to adapt research to the realities that occur in the field. Sugiyono in Pasolong (2020) says that qualitative methods are research methods used to examine natural object conditions, as opposed to experiments, where researchers are key instruments, data collection techniques are carried out in triangulation (combined), data analysis is inductive and the results of qualitative research emphasize meaning rather than generalization. The research location taken was in East Java Province and the research site was the Office of the Regional Planning and Development Agency in East Java Province.
Results and Conclusions: The results of the study show that the Regional Development of East Java Province is basically to improve people's welfare based on social justice and is carried out sustainably. Development in an integrated and sustainable manner is oriented toward improving people's welfare. But until now, disparity and poverty are still problems in regional development. Sustainable inclusive infrastructure and economy are a priority for local government policies to reduce regional and socio-economic disparities by increasing inter-regional connectivity.
Implications of the research: This study presents policy implications that can be used by local, provincial, and national governments to encourage successful collaboration between regions. The consequences of this strategy could help develop stronger methods for enhancing regional cooperation.
Originality/value: This research presents an analysis of the paradigm shift from traditional bureaucracy to post-bureaucracy and how this change affects inter-regional cooperation. The study of bureaucratic paradigm changes in the context of inter-regional cooperation is a new contribution because it can provide a deeper understanding of the evolution of government governance in Indonesia.
References
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Arsyad, L. (2010). Ekonomi Pembangunan, edisi kelima. Yogyakarta: Upp Stim Ykpn.
Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Brookings Institution Press.
Braun, R. D., Moore, A. A., & Kroo, I. M. (1996). Use of the collaborative optimization architecture for launch vehicle design. 6th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 306–318. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1996-4018
Dewi, R. T. (2012). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Collaborative Governance Dalam Pengembangan Industri Kecil (Studi Kasus Tentang Kerajinan Reyog dan Pertunjukan Reyog di Kabupaten Ponorogo). UNS (Sebelas Maret University).
EFFENDI, M. (2002). Pengaruh Pendidikan, Komunikasi Dan Motivasi Terhadap Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Di Kepulauan Karimunjawa Kabupaten Jepara. PROGRAM PASCASARJANA UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO.
Faozan, H. (2007). MENYIKAPI ISSUE KELEMBAGAAN KERJASAMA ANTAR DAERAH DI TENGAH LOMPATAN KOLABORASI STRATEJIK GLOBAL: SEBUAH PROGNOSA AWAL. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 4(1), 1.
Fayzullokh, S., Barnogul, S., Dinara, A., & Sardor, K. (2023). Analyzing the Relationship Between Public Debt and Poverty Reduction in Developing Countries: an Empirical Study. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 17(7), e03257--e03257. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n7-001
Fitriandari, M., & Winata, H. (2021). Manajemen Pendidikan Untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Di Indonesia. Competence: Journal of Management Studies, 15(1), 1–13.
Goggin, M., Hall, J. S., Johnston, J., Plein, C., Roper, R., & Weissert, C. (1992). MANAGING ACCOUNTABILITY IN MEDICAID MANAGED CARE: THE POLITICS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT.
Haryono, N. (2012). Jejaring Untuk Membangun Kolaborasi Sektor Publik. Jurnal Jejaring Administrasi Publik, 1(4), 48–53.
Juhanis. (2012). Pengaruh Sektor Unggulan Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Wilayah Kabupaten Halmahera Selatan. Jurnal Plano Madani, I(1), 16–28.
Kato, I., Faridi, A., Revida, E., Damanik, D., Siregar, R. T., Purba, B., Firdaus, Silalahi, M., Ginting, A. M., Simarmata, H. M. P., & Weya, I. (2021). Manajemen Pembangunan Daerah. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Lawrence, T. B., Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069297
M.Zaenuri. (2008). Tata Kelola Pariwisata-Bencana Dalam Perspektif Collaborative Governance. Repository.Ub.Ac.Id. http://repository.ub.ac.id/160405/1/Muchamad Zaenuri.pdf
Marwanto, I. G. G. H., & Pramono, T. (2023). Implementation of Local Government Financial Reporting and Community Welfare. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(6), e1223--e1223. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i6.1223
McGowan, T., & Powell, J. (1990). Understanding School-University Collaboration Through New Educational Metaphors. Contemporary Education, 61(3), 112–118.
McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66, 33–43.
Milles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & others. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Moleong, L. J. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Osborne, S. P. (2010). Introduction The (New) Public Governance: a suitable case for treatment? In The new public governance? (pp. 17–32). Routledge.
Pamudji, S. (1985). Kerjasama antar daerah dalam rangka pembinaan wilayah: suatu tinjauan dari segi administrasi negara. Bina Aksara.
Pasolong, H. (2020). Metode penelitian administrasi publik. Penerbit Alfabeta.
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2000). Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), no. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00171
Rosen, E. D. (1993). Improving public sector productivity: Concepts and practice. Sage.
Siagian, S. P. (2005). Administrasi Pembangunan: Konsep. Dimensi, Dan Strateginya, Fourth Edition, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Simanjuntak, F. S. H., Kim, T. K., Lee, S. D., Ahn, B. S., Kim, H. S., & Lee, H. (2011). CaO-catalyzed synthesis of glycerol carbonate from glycerol and dimethyl carbonate: Isolation and characterization of an active Ca species. Applied Catalysis A: General, 401(1–2), 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.05.024
Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (1989). Metodologi penelitian survei. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Sopari, H., Oka, N. P., & Salman, D. (2014). A model of planning collaboration between Wakatobi National Park authority and Wakatobi regency government in sustainable natural resource management. Jurnal Sains Dan Teknology, 14(2), 189–198.
Sulistiyani, A. T., Yuliani, K., & Yuliana, M. (2017). The Responsiveness and the Ability of “Kampung Tangguh Bencana” in Handling Flood in Yogyakarta City. The Indonesian Journal of Planning and Development, 2(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijpd.2.2.94-107
Suparmoko. (2022). Ekonomi Publik. Andi Yoigyakarta.
Thomson, A., & Perry, J. (2006). Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
Weichhart. (2002). Globalization Die Globalisierung und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Regionen. IN: H. DACHS und R.FLOIMAIR, Hrsg., Salzburger Jahrbuch fur Politik. Salzburg (Schritenreihe Des Lands- Presseburos, Glenview, Illionis London, England Sunder- Plublikationen, Nr. 180.
Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001
Wrihatnolo, R. (2013). R. dan Dwidjowijoto. Riant. Nugroho.
Yuliati, A. (2001). Kemandirian dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dalam Menyongsong Otonomi Daerah (Studi Kasus Kabupaten Sleman, DIY). Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Bisnis (KEBI), 6(Edisi April-Juli 2001, STIE Kerjasama (Stiekers)), 19.
Zaenuri, M., Musa, Y., & Iqbal, M. (2021). Collaboration Governance In The Development Of Natural Based Tourism Destinations. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 5(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v5i1.2839
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Rozikin, sofwani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
