Legal Aspects of Pedagogical Education in a Digital Society Under the Implementation of the Social Function of the State
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i6.1253Keywords:
digital society, legal aspects, social function, data protection, educational technologyAbstract
Objective: The purpose of this research article is to examine legal aspects of pedagogical education in digital society and analyze how they are affected by the implementation of the social function of the state.
Method: The study is based on a review of relevant literature, legal documents, and online sources in the field of pedagogy and law. The design of the study involves a qualitative approach, with data analyzed using content analysis and thematic analysis techniques.
Result: The study explores a range of legal issues related to pedagogical education in the digital society, including privacy, data protection, copyright, intellectual property, online safety, and cybersecurity. The findings of the study reveal that the implementation of the social function of the state has significant implications for the legal aspects of pedagogical education in the digital society.
Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of legal frameworks to ensure safe, effective, and responsible use of digital technologies in pedagogical activities. The practical implications of this research are numerous, including the need for policymakers to develop and enforce legal frameworks that protect the rights of students and teachers in the digital age. The study also emphasizes the need for educators to be trained in legal issues related to digital technologies, so they can effectively navigate the changing landscape of pedagogical education in the digital society. This article provides valuable insights into the legal aspects of pedagogical education in the digital society and offers recommendations for future research and policy development in this area.
References
Alam, A. (2022). Platform Utilising Blockchain Technology for eLearning and Online Education for Open Sharing of Academic Proficiency and Progress Records. In Smart Data Intelligence: Proceedings of ICSMDI 2022 (pp. 307-320). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Alier, M., Casañ Guerrero, M. J., Amo, D., Severance, C., & Fonseca, D. (2021). Privacy and E-learning: A pending task. Sustainability, 13(16), 9206.
Bondarenko, S., Makeieva, O., Usachenko, O., Veklych, V., Arifkhodzhaieva, T., & Lernyk, S. (2022). The Legal Mechanisms for Information Security in the context of Digitalization. Journal of Information Technology Management, 14(Special Issue: Digitalization of Socio-Economic Processes), 25-58.
Chen, X., Chen, S., Wang, X., & Huang, Y. (2021). " I was afraid, but now I enjoy being a streamer!" Understanding the Challenges and Prospects of Using Live Streaming for Online Education. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW3), 1-32.
Fake, H., & Dabbagh, N. (2020). Personalized learning within online workforce learning environments: Exploring implementations, obstacles, opportunities, and perspectives of workforce leaders. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25, 789-809.
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449-2472.
Fiala-Butora, J. (2019). The Controversy Over Ukraine’s New Law on Education: Conflict Prevention and Minority Rights Protection as Divergent Objectives?. European Yearbook of Minority Issues, 17(1).
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Hutchinson, K. H. (2003). The teach act: Copyright law and online education. NYUL Rev., 78, 2204.
Hutsaliuk O., Levchenko A., Storozhuk O., Zalevskyi A., Doroshenko T., & Hryhorash S. (2023a). Directions for increasing the level of environmental friendliness of innovative and investment attractiveness of transport and logistics companies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1126(1), 012028. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1126/1/012028
Hutsaliuk, O., Bondar, Iu., Kotsiurba, O., Ostapenko, O., Skoptsov, K., & Boiko O. (2023b). Factor-criteria assessment of greening prerequisites for transport infrastructure development in Ukraine. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1126(1), 012009. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1126/1/012009
Hutsaliuk, O., Havrylova, N., Alibekova, B., Rakayeva, A., Bondar, Iu., & Kovalenko, Yu. (2023c). Management of Renewable Resources in the Energy Sector: Environmental, Economic and Financial Aspects. Green Energy and Technology. Circular Economy for Renewable Energy. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30800-0
Hwang, M. I., & Helser, S. (2022). Cybersecurity educational games: a theoretical framework. Information & Computer Security, 30(2), 225-242.
Li, Y., & Liu, Q. (2021). A comprehensive review study of cyber-attacks and cyber security; Emerging trends and recent developments. Energy Reports, 7, 8176-8186.
Martin, A. (2006). Literacies for the digital age: preview of Part 1. Digital literacies for learning, 3-25.
McCallister, E. (2010). Guide to protecting the confidentiality of personally identifiable information (Vol. 800, No. 122). Diane Publishing.
McGill, M. L. (2013). Copyright and intellectual property: the state of the discipline. Book History, 16(1), 387-427.
Nashynets-Naumova, A., Buriachok, V., Korshun, N., Zhyltsov, O., Skladannyi, P., & Kuzmenko, L. (2020). Technology for information and cyber security in higher education institutions of Ukraine. Information technologies and teaching aids, 77(3), 337-354.
Rodotà, S. (2009). Data protection as a fundamental right. In Reinventing data protection? (pp. 77-82). Springer Netherlands.
Rodriguez, V. H. P., Morales, A. J. G., Navarro, L. R. R., Rosado, C. E. S., Espinoza, L. V., & Hernandez, O. H. (2023). Pedagogical Leadership in the Educational Management of Peruvian Educational Institutions. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(4), e01548.
Sable, R. G., & Bhatt, K. D. (2023). NEP 2020: Linking Emotional Intelligence and Bloom’s Affective Domain Categories to New Pedagogical and Curricular Structure. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(7), e03038.
Savotina, N. A., Khachikyan, E. I., Bondarenko, V., & Ilyukhina, A. (2020, November). Digital technology in modern education: risks and resources. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1691, No. 1, p. 012095). IOP Publishing.
Scanlon, G., Radeva, S., Pitsia, V., Maguire, C., & Nikolaeva, S. (2022). Attitudes of teachers in Bulgarian kindergartens towards inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103650.
Steiu, M. F. (2020). Blockchain in education: Opportunities, applications, and challenges. First Monday.
Tsai, Y. S., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., & Gašević, D. (2020, March). The privacy paradox and its implications for learning analytics. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 230-239).
Weber, A. S. (2012). Cloud computing in education. In Ubiquitous and mobile learning in the digital age (pp. 19-36). New York, NY: Springer New York.
Whitman, M. E., & Mattord, H. J. (2021). Principles of information security. Cengage learning.
Wylde, V., Rawindaran, N., Lawrence, J., Balasubramanian, R., Prakash, E., Jayal, A., et al. 2022). Cybersecurity, data privacy and blockchain: A review. SN Computer Science, 3(2), 127.
Yuan, B., & Li, J. (2019). The policy effect of the general data protection regulation (GDPR) on the digital public health sector in the European Union: an empirical investigation. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(6), 1070.
Zhang, Y. (2022). Development and application of artificial intelligence multimedia technology based on big data. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, 1-10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
