The Legal Nature of Pre-Contract Negotiations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i6.1227Keywords:
pre-contract negotiations, legal nature, final contract, contractual and tort liabilityAbstract
Objectives: One of the objectives that prompted us to search for (the legal nature of the negotiations leading to the contract) is to adapt these negotiations so that the legal provisions that apply to them are identified, in addition to knowing the legal nature of the responsibility that arises on the negotiating parties as a result of their breach of the obligations and principles on which the negotiations are based to provide legal protection for the negotiating parties as a result of this breach.
Theoretical Framework: The negotiations leading up to the agreement shall be based on the basic principles of good faith, confidentiality, and freedom of contract. The civil liability of negotiators oscillates between tort and contractual. The mutual obligations between the parties to the negotiation are fixed and unified.
Method: We followed the descriptive approach in explaining the concept of negotiations leading to the contract, as well as understanding the different phenomena and relationships between the parties to the negotiating relationship leading to the agreement, and the comparative approach was used by comparing the research between Iraqi, French and Egyptian law.
Results: The negotiations leading up to the contract are considered a set of preliminary procedures carried out by the negotiating parties that precede the conclusion of the contract in a final manner. Negotiations leading to the agreement are characterized by several characteristics, being a prelude to the contract and voluntary negotiations so that one party does not have authority or restrictions on the other.
Originality/ Value: The present research pertains to the legal character of the talks conducted by the parties involved prior to the finalization of the contract. This pertains to the process of engaging in talks that culminate in the establishment of a consensus about fundamental values such as good faith, confidentiality, and freedom of contract.
References
Al-Ayal, A. T. H. (2022). Effect of rationalization of a minor granted by the subject judge (A comparative study between the Iraqi Civil Code No. 40 of 1951 in force as amended and Personal Status Law No. 188 of 1959 in force as amended.). Basic Education College Magazine For Educational and Humanities Sciences, 14(55).
Amirkhanyan, A. A. (2009). Collaborative performance measurement: Examining and explaining the prevalence of collaboration in state and local government contracts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 523-554.
Dhanapal, K., & Renganathan, K. (2023). Competition Law Concerns on Cryptocurrencies. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(7), e02774-e02774.
Firth, A. (2014). The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace (Vol. 15): Elsevier.
Gastinger, M. (2016). The tables have turned on the European Commission: The changing nature of the pre-negotiation phase in EU bilateral trade agreements. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1367-1385.
Hameedi, K. S., Union, A. H., Talab, H. R., & Almagtome, A. H. (2022). IFRS adoption, cost of equity and firm value: evidence from Iraq. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 7(3), 1.
Juana, A., Kango, U., Singh, S. K., Abdussamad, Z. K., & Ismail, Y. L. (2023). Trends of Research Keywords Related to the Network and Negotiating Skills in Digital Era: A Bibliometric Review. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(6), e01027-e01027.
Khorasany, M., Paudel, A., Razzaghi, R., & Siano, P. (2020). A new method for peer matching and negotiation of prosumers in peer-to-peer energy markets. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 12(3), 2472-2483.
Li, Q., He, L., & Lin, X. (2013). Categorical term frequency probability based feature selection for document categorization. Paper presented at the 2013 International Conference on Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR).
Lizotte, C. (2020). Laïcité as assimilation, laïcité as negotiation: Political geographies of secularism in the French public school. Political geography, 77, 102121.
Maarif, A. S. (2020). The strategy of meaning negotiation in pragmatic class. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan, 7(2), 223-228.
Manipol, V. S. (2023). Perceived Impact in the Implementation of Microenterprise Law: A Qualitative Study in the Philippines. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(7), e02781-e02781.
Ouwens, P. J. (2020). There are Two Sides to Every Coin: An Analysis of the US-Taliban Peace Negotiations (2018-2019) A reassessment of William I. Zartman's ripeness theory with the Afghanistan conflict as a case study.
Poppe, A. E., Leininger, J., & Wolff, J. (2019). Beyond contestation: conceptualizing negotiation in democracy promotion. Democratization, 26(5), 777-795.
Selberg, N. (2023). Autonomous Regulation of Work in the Gig Economy: The first collective bargaining agreement for riders in Sweden. European Labour Law Journal, 20319525231178980.
Thomas, B. (2021). American literary realism and the failed promise of contract: University of California Press.
Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of educational research, 72(2), 131-175.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
