Content Analysis of European Corporate Responses to COVID-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i6.1222Keywords:
pandemic, stakeholder theory, corporate social responsibility, european corporate responsesAbstract
Objective: This paper examines the role of European multinationals in battling the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, by analyzing their utilized mechanisms for response and actual corporate responses towards their primary stakeholders.
Method: This study applied manual content analysis to the disclosures of the first 25 European corporations listed on the Fortune World Most Admired Companies, by investigating their newsletters, press releases and reports published on their websites.
Results: The findings of this research pointed out that sampled corporations have partnered with various external bodies and capitalized on their internal competencies and international presence to exert impactful responses. The outcomes of this research revealed the tremendous amount of corporations’ care for their employees, customers, and host communities’ needs. This study hinted out that both the stakeholder theory and corporate social responsibility viewpoints were integrated upon approaching the society’s emerging challenges, due to the scope and scale of the challenges faced.
Conclusion: This article investigates the European corporate responses to the pandemic, with evidences regarding where those specific contributions have gone and the mechanisms practiced to achieve these responses, unlike previous research. It has significant practical implications as to the role of businesses in combating social dilemmas in times of crises.
References
Al-Zoubi, A. M. (2023). “COVID-19 Pandemic and Financial Performance”, International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(4), e0825-e0825.
Amato, L. and Amato, C, (2007), “The Effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 72, No 3, pp. 229–241.
Basu, K. and Pazzo, G., (2008), “Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking”, Academy of Management Review, Vol 33, pp. 122-136.
Batty, R.J., Cuskelly, G., and Toohey, K., (2016). “Community sports events and CSR sponsorship: Examining the impacts of a public health agenda”, Journal of Sport and Social Issues, Vol 40, No 6, pp. 1-20.
Berman, L.S. and Johnson-Cramer, E. M., (2019), “Stakeholder Theory: Seeing the field through the forest”, Business & Society, Vol. 58, No 7, pp. 1358—1375.
Brulhart, F., Gherra, S., and Quelin, B.V., (2019), “Do stakeholder orientation and environmental proactivity impact firm profitability?” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 158, No 1, pp. 25-46.
Campbell, D. and Slack. R., (2006), “Public Visibility as a Determinant of the Rate of Corporate Charitable Donations”, Business Ethics. European Review, Vol 15, No 1, pp. 19–28.
Campbell, J.L., (2007), “Why would corporations behave in social responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility”, Academy of Management Review, Vol 32, pp. 946-67.
Campopiano, G. and De Massis, A., (2015). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A content analysis in family and non-family firms, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 129, No 3, pp. 511-534.
Chaudhary, R., and Akhouri, A., (2018), “Linking corporate social responsibility attributions and creativity: Modeling work engagement as a mediator”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol 190, pp. 809-821.
Cooper, S., Crowther, D., Davies, M. and Davis, E., (2001), “Shareholder or stakeholder value: The development of indicators for the control and measurement of performance”. London: The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.
Cotrill, H., (1990), “Corporate social responsibility and the marketplace”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 9, pp. 723-729.
DiStaso, M.W. and Brown, B.N., (2015), “From owned to earned media: An analysis of corporate effects about being on Fortune list”, Communication Research Report, Vol 32, No 3, pp. 191-198.
Dmytriyev, S., Freeman, E. and Horisch, J., (2021). “The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, similarities, and implications for social issues in management”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol 0, No. 1, pp. 1-30. Doi: 10.1111/joms.12684.
Eells, R. and Walton, C., (1974). Conceptual Foundations of Business, 3rd edition. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
Fernando, M., (2010). “Corporate social responsibility in the wake of the Asian Tsunami: Effect of time on the genuineness of CSR initiatives”, European Management Journal, Vol 28, No. 1, pp. 68-79.
Freeman, R.E., (1984). “Stakeholder Theory”. In R.E. Freeman (Ed.), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder approach, Pitman Publishing Inc.
Freeman, R.E., (2002), “Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation”. In T. Donaldson and R. Werhane (eds). Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 7th edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, pp. 38-48.
Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J., and Wicks, A., (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Friedman, T. , (2008), Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why we need a green revolution and how it can renew America, New York: Farrrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gardberg, N.A., Zyglidopoulos, S. C., Symeou, P.C., and Schepers, D.H, (2019). “The impact of corporate philanthropy on reputation for corporate social performance”, Business and Society, Vol 58, pp. 1177-1208.
Godfrey, P., Merrill, C., and Hansen J., (2009), “The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol 30, No 4, pp. 425–445.
Gond, J., Akremi, A. E.L., Swaen, V., and Babu, N., (2017). “The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol 38, pp. 225-246.
Gray, R., Kouchy, R. and Lavers, S., (1995), “Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and longitudinal study of UK disclosures”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol 8, No 2, pp. 47-77.
Hillman A.J., and Keim, G.D., (2001), “Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 22, No 2, pp. 125–139.
Jeffrey, S., Rosenberg, S. and McCabe, B., (2019). “Corporate social responsibility behaviors and corporate reputation”. Social Responsibility Journal, Vol 15, No 3, pp. 395-408.
Johnson, B.R., Connolly, E., and Carter, T.S., (2011), “Corporate social responsibility: The role of Fortune 100 companies in domestic and international natural disasters”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol 18, No 6, pp. 352-369.
Krippendorff, K., (1989). “Content analysis”. In Barnouw, E., Gerbner, G., Schramm, W., Worth, T.L. and Gross, L. (Eds), International Encyclopedia of Communication, (1), New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 403-407.
Krippenforff, K., (1980), Content Analysis: An introduction to its methodology, London: Sage Publications.
Mahmud, A., Ding, D., and Hasan, M., (2021). “Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic”, SAGE Open, Vol 1, No 17. DOI: 10.1177/2158244020988710.
Maxfield, M.G. and Babbie, E.R., (2013), “Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology”, 7th ed., Wadsworth, Stamford, CT.
McWilliams, A., and Siegal, D.S., (2001), “Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol 26, pp. 117-27.
Metcalfe, C., (1998), “The stakeholder corporation”, Business Ethics: A European review, Vol 7, No 1, pp. 30-36.
Milne, M., and Adler, R., (1999). “Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis”, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, Vol 12, No 2, pp. 237-49.
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., and Wood, D., (1997). “Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts”, Academy of Management Review, Vol 22, No 4, pp. 853-896.
Mitnick, B., (2000). “Commitment, revelation, and the testaments of belief: The metrics of measurement of corporate social performance”, Business and Society, Vol 39, No 4, pp. 419-456.
Mugova, S., Mudenda, M., and Sachs, P.R. (2017), “Corporate social responsibility in challenging times in developing countries shame”. In S. Idowu, S. Vertigans, & A. Schiopoiu Burlea (Eds). CSR, Sustainability, Ethics, & Governance, Springer, pp. 207-228.
Muller, A.R., Pfarrer, M.D., and Little, L.M., (2014), “A theory of collective empathy in corporate philanthropy decisions”, Academy of Management Review, Vol 39, No 1, pp. 1-21.
Patten, D., (2008). “Does the market value corporate philanthropy? Evidence from the response to the 2004 tsunami relief effort”. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 81, No 3, pp. 599–607.
Payne, G.T., Brigham, K.H., Broberg, J.C., Moss, T.W. and Short, J.C., (2011). “Organizational virtue orientation and family firms”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol 219, No 2, pp. 257-285.
Phillips, R. and Freeman, R.E., (2008). “Corporate citizenship and community stakeholders”. In Scherer, A. G. and Palazzo, G. (Eds). Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 99-115.
Randle, M., Kemperman, A., and Dolnicar, S., (2019), “Making cause-related corporate social responsibility (CSR) count in holiday accommodation choice”, Tourism Management, Vol 75, pp. 66-77.
Reynolds, S., Schultz, F., and Hekman, D., (2006), Stakeholder theory and managerial decision-making: Constraints and implications of balancing stakeholder interests, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 64, pp. 285-301.
Saad, S. M., & Yaaqoob, I. I. (2022). “Building a Corporate Social Responsibility Indicator in View of the Covid-19 Pandemic Based on Selected International Experiences”. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(5), e0808-e0808.
Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A., (2015), Research Methods for Business Students, 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.
SIM. (2020), “The Social Issues in Management Division at the Academy of Management”, Available at: http://aom.org/Divisions-and-Interest-Groups/Social-Issues -in-Management/.aspx (accessed January, 2021).
Stieb, A. J., (2008), “Assessing Freeman’s Stakeholder Theory”, Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 401-414.
Sulkowski, A. J. Edwards, M. and Freeman, R.E., (2018), “Shake your stakeholder: Firms leading engagement to cocreate sustainable value”, Organization and Environment, Vol 31, pp. 223-241.
Sweeney, L. and Coughlan, J., (2008), “Do different industries report Corporate Social Responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory”, Journal of Marketing Communications, Vol 14, No 2, pp. 113-124.
Waddock, S., and Graves, S., (1997), “Finding the link between stakeholder relations and quality of management”, Journal of Investing, Vol 6, No 4, pp. 20-25.
Wang, H., Choi, J., Li, J., (2008), “Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance”, Organization Science, Vol 19, pp. 142–159.
Wood, D.J., (1991), “Corporate social performance revisited”, Academy of Management Review, Vol 16, pp. 691-718.
Xiao, M., Cooke, F.L., Xu, J., and Bian, H., (2020), “To what extent is corporate social responsibility part of human resource management in the Chinese context? A review of literature and future research directions”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol 30, No 4, Article 100726.
Zhang, R., Rezaee, Z., and Zhu, J., (2009), “Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: Evidence from Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan earthquake”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 91, No 1, pp. 51–63.
Zhao, M., Wang, F., Zhao, D., and Wei, J., (2015), “Using CSR theory to examine disaster aid response to the Wenchuan earthquake”, Global Business and Organizational Excellence, Vol 34, pp. 50-59.
Zhao, X., Wu, C., Chen, C.C. and Zhou, Z., (2020), “The influence of corporate social responsibility on incumbent employees: A meta-analytic investigation of the mediating and moderating mechanisms”, Journal of Management, pp. 1-33.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
