Examining Legal Difficulties and Potential Benefits of Social Businesses

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i6.1185

Keywords:

legal difficulties, potential benefits, social businesses, dynamic, legal, collaborative framework

Abstract

Objective: A compelling combination of profit-driven corporations with socially impactful efforts, the concept of social businesses has arisen in recent years. Both the legal hurdles that social enterprises must overcome and the intriguing opportunities they present are explored in this in-depth analysis. The research elucidates the complex nature of social businesses by highlighting the importance of this hybrid model (HM) in tackling urgent societal concerns. Sustainable development and inclusive growth are two goals that social firms can help achieve by exploring the nexus of profit-making and social responsibility. Further, obstacles to their smooth functioning and expansion are uncovered through an in-depth examination of the difficulties they confront, especially in the legal sphere.

 

Method: The present research proposes a dynamic legal collaborative framework (DLCF) for adaptive compliance, which would involve the creation of flexible legal frameworks to balance competing economic and social goals. Using this innovative strategy, social enterprises may ensure their continued financial health while achieving the positive social impact they set out to achieve. The proposed method also emphasizes the significance of cooperation between lawyers, business people, and policymakers in creating a hospitable legal framework.

 

Result:  Healthcare, education, environmental protection, and poverty reduction represent few of the areas that could benefit from the results of this research.  For further evaluation of the proposed method's viability in addressing legal hurdles and maximizing social benefit, a simulation analysis is carried out. Using hypothetical situations, researchers can examine the advantages and disadvantages of various legal approaches and make more informed decisions.

 

Conclusion: This research highlights the significance of cooperation between legal, entrepreneurial, and regulatory parties in creating the future of socially responsible business.

References

Hota, P. K., Subramanian, B., & Narayanamurthy, G. (2020). Mapping the intellectual structure of social entrepreneurship research: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of business ethics, 166(1), 89-114.

Popkova, E. G., & Sergi, B. S. (2020). Human capital and AI in industry 4.0. Convergence and divergence in social entrepreneurship in Russia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(4), 565-581.

Gupta, P., Chauhan, S., Paul, J., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2020). Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda. Journal of business research, 113, 209-229.

Rahadjeng ER, Pratikto H, Mukhlis I, Restuningdiah N. Analysis of Financial Technology, Financial Literacy, Financial Attitudes, on Mediated Business Performance Financial Inclusion and Self-Efficiency in Small Medium Industry (SMI) in Malang City, Indonesia. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 2023 Aug 2;8(8):e03041-.

Kouhizadeh, M., Saberi, S., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. International journal of production economics, 231, 107831.

Bansal, S., Garg, I., & Sharma, G. D. (2019). Social entrepreneurship as a path for social change and driver of sustainable development: A systematic review and research agenda. Sustainability, 11(4), 1091.

Tawfik OI. The Effect of Political Connections and Family Ownership on Operating Cash Flows Management: Empirical Evidence from Egypt. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 2023 Aug 2;8(8):e03028-

Dutta, P., Choi, T. M., Somani, S., & Butala, R. (2020). Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities. Transportation research part e: Logistics and transportation review, 142, 102067.

Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019). Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 43(1), 82-115.

Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications policy, 44(6), 101976.

Steiner, A., & Teasdale, S. (2019). Unlocking the potential of rural social enterprise. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 144-154.

Wiseman, L., Sanderson, J., Zhang, A., & Jakku, E. (2019). Farmers and their data: An examination of farmers’ reluctance to share their data through the lens of the laws impacting smart farming. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90, 100301.

Richter, R. (2019). Rural social enterprises as embedded intermediaries: The innovative power of connecting rural communities with supra-regional networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 179-187.

Janssen, M., Weerakkody, V., Ismagilova, E., Sivarajah, U., & Irani, Z. (2020). A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: Integrating institutional, market and technical factors. International journal of information management, 50, 302-309.

Di Domenico, M., Tracey, P., & Haugh, H. (2020). The dialectic of social exchange: Theorizing corporate-social enterprise collaboration. In Organizational Collaboration (pp. 100-118). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-11

How to Cite

Kumar, B., & Dwivedy, D. (2023). Examining Legal Difficulties and Potential Benefits of Social Businesses. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(6), e1184. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i6.1185