The Development and Effects of Environmental Law on Green Governance
Keywords:contrastive, exploration, influence of environmental law, green governance, environmental legislation
Objective: The legal framework governing ecological preservation and sustainability is best appreciated via research into the history and impact of environmental legislation on the "green" notion. It explains how laws and regulations affect the environment, shifting business models, government regulations, and individual attitudes and actions in a more sustainable direction. In a world where environmental legislation, sustainable practices, and ecological challenges are on the rise, it is crucial to have this knowledge. There are several obstacles in the way of the growth and consequences of environmental law on the "green" idea, including the need to strike a balance between economic interests and ecological preservation, the need to ensure worldwide harmonization of rules, and the need to adjust legal frameworks to handle developing environmental difficulties.
Method: This paper proposes the Contrastive Exploration and Influence of Environmental Law (CE&IEL), which will examine the development and current relevance of environmental law, focusing on its transformative effects on sustainable practices within the "green" framework. The research has a number of potential uses, including informing policy decisions by illuminating the ways in which environmental laws affect "green" practices, assisting industries in aligning with sustainable regulations to increase corporate responsibility, and assisting educational institutions in integrating legal and ecological perspectives to better prepare students for careers in environmental governance.
Result: Computerized models (CM) are used in the growth and impacts of environmental law on green to foresee how shifting environmental legislation would affect green business practices.
Conclusion: This strategy helps policymakers, industries, and researchers understand the dynamic interplay between legal reforms and their impact on developing ecological consciousness through the use of simulated trials of alternative legal approaches, revealing previously unknown insights.
Wu, H., Li, Y., Hao, Y., Ren, S., & Zhang, P. (2020). Environmental decentralization, local government competition, and regional green development: Evidence from China. Science of the total environment, 708, 135085.
Zhang, M., Sun, X., & Wang, W. (2020). Study on the effect of environmental regulations and industrial structure on haze pollution in China from the dual perspective of independence and linkage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120748.
Khan, Z., Sisi, Z., & Siqun, Y. (2019). Environmental regulations an option: Asymmetry effect of environmental regulations on carbon emissions using non-linear ARDL. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 41(2), 137-155.
Ausat AM, Permana B, Harahap MA. Do Information Technology and Human Resources Create Business Performance: A Review. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):e02206-.
Borsatto, J. M. L. S., & Amui, L. B. L. (2019). Green innovation: Unfolding the relation with environmental regulations and competitiveness. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 445-454.
Farro-Ruiz LM, Figueroa IK, Cardenas MB, Ramon EF, Chiparra WE. Education in Entrepreneurship: Systematic Review of Publications in Spanish Froml 2013 to 2023. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 2023 Aug 1;8(8):e03096-.
Liu, S., Qi, H., & Wan, Y. (2022). Driving factors behind the development of China's green bond market. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354, 131705.
Ahmed, Z., Ahmad, M., Rjoub, H., Kalugina, O. A., & Hussain, N. (2022). Economic growth, renewable energy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 30(4), 595-605.
Feng, T., Du, H., Lin, Z., & Zuo, J. (2020). Spatial spillover effects of environmental regulations on air pollution: Evidence from urban agglomerations in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 272, 110998.
Yasmeen, H., Tan, Q., Zameer, H., Tan, J., & Nawaz, K. (2020). Exploring the impact of technological innovation, environmental regulations and urbanization on ecological efficiency of China in the context of COP21. Journal of Environmental Management, 274, 111210.
Luo, Y., Salman, M., & Lu, Z. (2021). Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulations and foreign direct investment on green innovation across different regions in China. Science of the total environment, 759, 143744.
Zhang, J., Kang, L., Li, H., Ballesteros-Pérez, P., Skitmore, M., & Zuo, J. (2020). The impact of environmental regulations on urban Green innovation efficiency: The case of Xi'an. Sustainable Cities and Society, 57, 102123.
Li, H. L., Zhu, X. H., Chen, J. Y., & Jiang, F. T. (2019). Environmental regulations, environmental governance efficiency and the green transformation of China's iron and steel enterprises. Ecological economics, 165, 106397.
Wang, X., & Shao, Q. (2019). Non-linear effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: Evidence from panel threshold regression. Science of the Total Environment, 660, 1346-1354.
Shuai, S., & Fan, Z. (2020). Modeling the role of environmental regulations in regional green economy efficiency of China: Empirical evidence from super efficiency DEA-Tobit model. Journal of environmental management, 261, 110227.
Chacartegui, C. (2018). Workers' participation and green governance. Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J., 40, 89.
Gupta, J., & Sanchez, N. (2012). Global green governance: Embedding the green economy in a global green and equitable rule of law polity. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(1), 12-22.
Li, W., Zheng, M., Zhang, Y., & Cui, G. (2020). Green governance structure, ownership characteristics, and corporate financing constraints. Journal of cleaner production, 260, 121008.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.